From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I8MOb-000157-Vh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:33:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6AKWMqq013075; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:32:22 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6AKUQN0010856 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:30:27 GMT Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205CC65260 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:30:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] iuse defaults example Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:30:41 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20070710045824.GA6673@linux1> <200707101812.58384.bangert@gentoo.org> <20070710214402.0e9b79c0@eusebe> In-Reply-To: <20070710214402.0e9b79c0@eusebe> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5700221.BrWf9ZSimI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200707101630.42100.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 860ea6fa-bc4e-4f5f-9f28-f9bfb97405ab X-Archives-Hash: adba9ce262adbc5506f28e00b54018d7 --nextPart5700221.BrWf9ZSimI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 10 July 2007, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > On 2007/07/10, Thilo Bangert wrote: > > - we could finally kick all the no* USE flags. USE flags are use > > flags - they determine what should be used. not what should not be > > used... > > Because of the way USE flags stack in Portage (the USE_ORDER variable), > IUSE defaults are not a solution for dropping no* flags: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/43137/focus=3D43175 > As Zac pointed out in his reply to this post, dropping nocxx and > friends is more a job for use.force / package.use.force. the no* flags were introduced more to address default behavior than the -*= =20 case, so yes we can kick many of the no* USE flags also, use.force isnt exactly a nice solution ... more like brute force, i'm= =20 not sure any no* flag would be appropriate =2Dmike --nextPart5700221.BrWf9ZSimI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARpPscUFjO5/oN/WBAQJLdRAAikvKIyoyO3NWzoEK7GZhOadATPfCkRxO kWdf9CrKk6aES+QEiCucFvCQj7SnkpRpwVcUSzKh+hiJefg4tZHcRz84wjTM8gJM H9T0cyztWHQAdqUHSSegEIymTWg2idWAKIA+NunuYYQUsods36ifyAyf6kMY9fLQ TQFU4e1KwAMrIBEkJxsbYYfqWl5vCqbIGUgvTMqA+uiEG94TWenJMuSpuqBVfgma nmWlbV0AMbfVrklQypDEGvIaG7YbYGyL3DzsRaCJdWyU3WZu1bqwySMFxYLBqQjN yoGnxBuPIA5m2ejqpJXnnwfVSQgzuBzZVLuV7BrQPJoDhuXVEwohFZ2fqOfKKEmE Qs1JHKYK//tHpyWuQhx+EXEwqIJd+NzLpAbyS0/oQ8AfyEGUbmzjc3yhKNrEPe7L 4a9kOmQVWa3ZS4AZMjZN+/QImU7z55cF+Q5Zspj3QMJMcjNdRMHIt2F+nsm60Q5w 9hXIKKGOoLzxIGSdmrCS+QZpIcwkyvJFy7c++pYHvXqJuRO3fikzu4MPqwFTBCgq O2FFof1BoobR6qQzcn1fyIFjU2UWkUDoWmTPlZ7MPwSzj6SgJbWPmxfnN3jRb+IL m115SvwsNhUIfvBuujg8Gn9otItIJ6cvWwEoijWBKRTCHJ6JH4ujq9rARWs9F3js Umljqawxztw= =UjYv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5700221.BrWf9ZSimI-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list