From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I7bO2-0007Fx-MK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 18:21:35 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l68IJP0B013115; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 18:19:25 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l68IFcSE007083 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 18:15:39 GMT Received: from gentoo.org (unknown [84.29.252.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7681650EF for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 18:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 20:15:31 +0200 From: Harald van =?utf-8?Q?D=C4=B3k?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Watch out for license changes to GPL-3. Message-ID: <20070708181531.GA8235@boostbox.mill1.nb.home.nl> References: <1183832495.20203.11.camel@SOLACE> <468FDCFE.1060404@gentoo.org> <4690C4B8.4000407@gentoo.org> <200707081350.27220.philantrop@gentoo.org> <1183899969.6634.1.camel@localhost> <20070708164657.4edd8378@localhost> <20070708155119.06c1d41a@snowflake> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070708155119.06c1d41a@snowflake> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Archives-Salt: eff71af3-5609-465e-ab26-92edf89788e6 X-Archives-Hash: 597849b56176b5f0af011a5b1e545eb0 On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 03:50:56PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 16:46:57 +0200 > Dominique Michel wrote: > > With the original statement "GPL-2" alone, you have to take contact > > and get an authorisation to move from each single programmer that > > contributed code into the project. > > No, you have to get permission of the copyright holders. Which, in this > case, is the Foundation. Could you back that up, please? I was looking for something to confirm or deny this myself, but didn't find anything. I did, however, find Quoting: "Note that the Foundation would never change the license used for the code or documentation, if that could be set in stone that would be even better." Is this still relevant? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list