public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
@ 2007-07-06  4:08 Mike Frysinger
  2007-07-06  4:21 ` Jim Ramsay
                   ` (12 more replies)
  0 siblings, 13 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2007-07-06  4:08 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 150 bytes --]

get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  4:08 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch Mike Frysinger
@ 2007-07-06  4:21 ` Jim Ramsay
  2007-07-06  4:43   ` Mike Frysinger
  2007-07-06  5:37 ` Mike Frysinger
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Jim Ramsay @ 2007-07-06  4:21 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 302 bytes --]

Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86

Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump?

-- 
Jim Ramsay
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm)

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  4:21 ` Jim Ramsay
@ 2007-07-06  4:43   ` Mike Frysinger
  2007-07-06  5:18     ` Jim Ramsay
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2007-07-06  4:43 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 302 bytes --]

On Friday 06 July 2007, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
>
> Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump?

no
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  4:43   ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2007-07-06  5:18     ` Jim Ramsay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Jim Ramsay @ 2007-07-06  5:18 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 264 bytes --]

Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Friday 06 July 2007, Jim Ramsay wrote:
>
> > Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump?
>
> no

And there was great rejoicing.

-- 
Jim Ramsay
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm)

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  4:08 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch Mike Frysinger
  2007-07-06  4:21 ` Jim Ramsay
@ 2007-07-06  5:37 ` Mike Frysinger
  2007-07-06  8:09 ` Petteri Räty
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2007-07-06  5:37 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 239 bytes --]

On Friday 06 July 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so

sorry, forgot about ~ia64 as well
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  4:08 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch Mike Frysinger
  2007-07-06  4:21 ` Jim Ramsay
  2007-07-06  5:37 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2007-07-06  8:09 ` Petteri Räty
  2007-07-06  9:48   ` George Shapovalov
  2007-07-06 10:33   ` Robert Buchholz
  2007-07-06 10:21 ` Luca Barbato
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 2 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Petteri Räty @ 2007-07-06  8:09 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 331 bytes --]

Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike

About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of course
switch not used by default so that's ok.

Regards,
Petteri


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  8:09 ` Petteri Räty
@ 2007-07-06  9:48   ` George Shapovalov
  2007-07-06 10:33   ` Robert Buchholz
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: George Shapovalov @ 2007-07-06  9:48 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Friday, 6. July 2007, Petteri Räty Ви написали:
> Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> > get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of course
> switch not used by default so that's ok.
If this makes people any happier - I had gnat-gcc-4.2.0 in the tree and ~arch 
(x86, amd64 and ppc) since when it came out, (that is approx 2 or 3 month 
now?) without any problems reported. That means technically gcc-4.2.0 with 
Ada support. However this does *not* clash with system gcc, so only Ada stuff 
was tested. Nonetheless, as I said, I did not get any 4.2.0 specific problem 
reports. Seemed to be a rather smooth ride so far..

George
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  4:08 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch Mike Frysinger
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-07-06  8:09 ` Petteri Räty
@ 2007-07-06 10:21 ` Luca Barbato
  2007-07-06 10:53   ` Andrew Gaffney
                     ` (2 more replies)
  2007-07-06 11:33 ` Samuli Suominen
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 3 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Luca Barbato @ 2007-07-06 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike

gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?

I'll give a test on ppc* soonish.

lu

-- 

Luca Barbato

Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  8:09 ` Petteri Räty
  2007-07-06  9:48   ` George Shapovalov
@ 2007-07-06 10:33   ` Robert Buchholz
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Robert Buchholz @ 2007-07-06 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: Petteri Räty

On Friday, 6. July 2007 10:09, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> > get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
> > -mike
>
> About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of
> course switch not used by default so that's ok.

Debian is going to 4.2 in unstable these days too and they already found 
and fixed a lot of bugs. You can view a list of current and fixed ones 
here:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.2;users=tbm@cyrius.com

A lot of the bugs are already quite old and might be fixed upstream 
already.

Robert
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06 10:21 ` Luca Barbato
@ 2007-07-06 10:53   ` Andrew Gaffney
  2007-07-06 15:11   ` Mike Frysinger
  2007-07-06 19:20   ` Donnie Berkholz
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Gaffney @ 2007-07-06 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Luca Barbato wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
>> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
>> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
>> in the next day or so
>> -mike
> 
> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?

I see they got around to adding the -fno-rape-house-or-burn-pet flag.

-- 
Andrew Gaffney                                 http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
Gentoo Linux Developer             Catalyst/Installer + x86 release coordinator
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  4:08 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch Mike Frysinger
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-07-06 10:21 ` Luca Barbato
@ 2007-07-06 11:33 ` Samuli Suominen
  2007-07-06 12:06 ` Roy Marples
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Samuli Suominen @ 2007-07-06 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:08:43 -0400
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:

> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike

-DRAC-WAS-HERE == -O4 now?
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  4:08 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch Mike Frysinger
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-07-06 11:33 ` Samuli Suominen
@ 2007-07-06 12:06 ` Roy Marples
  2007-07-06 14:58 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Roy Marples @ 2007-07-06 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 00:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so

Been using it for a few weeks on ~x86-fbsd without issue now.
Any chance you could add a patch [1] to it though that affects loops and
-O2?

Thanks

Roy

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32500

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-dev]  Re: glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  4:08 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch Mike Frysinger
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-07-06 12:06 ` Roy Marples
@ 2007-07-06 14:58 ` Duncan
  2007-07-06 15:13   ` Mike Frysinger
  2007-07-06 17:03 ` [gentoo-dev] " Harald van Dijk
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Duncan @ 2007-07-06 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> posted
200707060008.44389.vapier@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on  Fri, 06 Jul
2007 00:08:43 -0400:

> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so

Could you reopen bug #179744 (kdesvn amd64 -fPIC issue) and add it to the 
4.2 tracker?  I didn't file it so can't, but it's definitely 4.2 related.

(As mentioned there, there's a kdesvn-0.12.1 upstream that's not in-tree 
yet, but I just tested it and it doesn't solve the issue.)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06 10:21 ` Luca Barbato
  2007-07-06 10:53   ` Andrew Gaffney
@ 2007-07-06 15:11   ` Mike Frysinger
  2007-07-06 15:21     ` Luca Barbato
  2007-07-06 19:20   ` Donnie Berkholz
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2007-07-06 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 551 bytes --]

On Friday 06 July 2007, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
>
> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
>
> I'll give a test on ppc* soonish.

i wasnt going to add ~ppc because of 179218, but i remember now that the bug 
is for ppc64 only and i've been using gcc-4.2.0 on my quad since i added 
it ... so i'll toss ~ppc into gcc-4.2.0 as well
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06 14:58 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
@ 2007-07-06 15:13   ` Mike Frysinger
  2007-07-06 17:52     ` Duncan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2007-07-06 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 210 bytes --]

On Friday 06 July 2007, Duncan wrote:
> Could you reopen bug #179744 (kdesvn amd64 -fPIC issue) and add it to the
> 4.2 tracker?  I didn't file it so can't, but it's definitely 4.2 related.

done, cheers
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06 15:11   ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2007-07-06 15:21     ` Luca Barbato
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Luca Barbato @ 2007-07-06 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 06 July 2007, Luca Barbato wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
>>> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
>>> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
>>> in the next day or so
>> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
>>
>> I'll give a test on ppc* soonish.
> 
> i wasnt going to add ~ppc because of 179218, but i remember now that the bug 
> is for ppc64 only and i've been using gcc-4.2.0 on my quad since i added 
> it ... so i'll toss ~ppc into gcc-4.2.0 as well
> -mike

gcc-4.3 works fine on ppc64 so far ^^;

lu

-- 

Luca Barbato

Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  4:08 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch Mike Frysinger
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-07-06 14:58 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
@ 2007-07-06 17:03 ` Harald van Dijk
  2007-07-06 17:32   ` Mike Frysinger
  2007-07-06 18:25 ` [gentoo-dev] " Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Harald van Dijk @ 2007-07-06 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:08:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so

Why 4.2.0 rather than 4.2.1 RC1? Are there problems with the RC, or are
all important patches since 4.2.0 added by the ebuild already?
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06 17:03 ` [gentoo-dev] " Harald van Dijk
@ 2007-07-06 17:32   ` Mike Frysinger
  2007-07-07  0:21     ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2007-07-06 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 809 bytes --]

On Friday 06 July 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:08:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
>
> Why 4.2.0 rather than 4.2.1 RC1? Are there problems with the RC, or are
> all important patches since 4.2.0 added by the ebuild already?

Gentoo hasnt done RC's in a long time and i didnt really have any plans to 
start ... the toolchain overlay contains ebuilds for all weekly snaps

ive added patches to gcc-4.2.0 based on initial testing from all you ricers 
out there and with the help of Ryan Hill

i dont plan on gcc-4.2.0 ever hitting stable, just opening up the testers so 
gcc-4.2.1 will be smooth
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-dev]  Re: glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06 15:13   ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2007-07-06 17:52     ` Duncan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Duncan @ 2007-07-06 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> posted
200707061113.31272.vapier@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on  Fri, 06 Jul
2007 11:13:30 -0400:

>> Could you reopen bug #179744 (kdesvn amd64 -fPIC issue) and add it to
>> the 4.2 tracker?  I didn't file it so can't, but it's definitely 4.2
>> related.
> 
> done, cheers

Thanks. =8^)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  4:08 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch Mike Frysinger
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-07-06 17:03 ` [gentoo-dev] " Harald van Dijk
@ 2007-07-06 18:25 ` Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
  2007-07-06 18:33   ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
  2007-07-06 18:43   ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
  2007-07-06 18:45 ` Adam James
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 2 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Marijn Schouten (hkBst) @ 2007-07-06 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike

- From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use glibc2.5 for
now". Emacs herd seems to be in hiding, so I haven't been able to confirm with
them.

Marijn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGjokEp/VmCx0OL2wRAvS0AKCKJVbzUlK8X49G+qL57RVkbFDLpgCgo2dv
ktrumqwQGI/paU06eL2p5hg=
=I8cX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06 18:25 ` [gentoo-dev] " Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
@ 2007-07-06 18:33   ` Christian Faulhammer
  2007-07-06 18:43   ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Christian Faulhammer @ 2007-07-06 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 418 bytes --]

"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <hkBst@gentoo.org>:

> - From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use
> glibc2.5 for now". Emacs herd seems to be in hiding, so I haven't
> been able to confirm with them.

 We are old-school and don't hang around on IRC.  We are very
responsive to bug reports and emails...

V-Li

-- 
http://www.gentoo.org/
http://www.faulhammer.org/
http://www.gnupg.org/

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06 18:25 ` [gentoo-dev] " Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
  2007-07-06 18:33   ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
@ 2007-07-06 18:43   ` Mike Frysinger
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2007-07-06 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 545 bytes --]

On Friday 06 July 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
>
> From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use glibc2.5
> for now". Emacs herd seems to be in hiding, so I haven't been able to
> confirm with them.

this is due to some malloc changes which we already addressed in our ebuild by 
snipping the relevant upstream fix
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  4:08 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch Mike Frysinger
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-07-06 18:25 ` [gentoo-dev] " Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
@ 2007-07-06 18:45 ` Adam James
  2007-07-07  1:44 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Adam James @ 2007-07-06 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:08:43 -0400
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:

> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so

Will we see the hardened gcc-4 patchset included in this?

--atj
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06 10:21 ` Luca Barbato
  2007-07-06 10:53   ` Andrew Gaffney
  2007-07-06 15:11   ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2007-07-06 19:20   ` Donnie Berkholz
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Donnie Berkholz @ 2007-07-06 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 230 bytes --]

Luca Barbato wrote:
> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
> 
> I'll give a test on ppc* soonish.

I've been using it on x86 and ppc32 (ibook g4) for a week or two with no
issues.

Thanks,
Donnie


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-dev]  Re: glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06 17:32   ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2007-07-07  0:21     ` Duncan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Duncan @ 2007-07-07  0:21 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> posted
200707061332.28490.vapier@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on  Fri, 06 Jul
2007 13:32:27 -0400:

> i dont plan on gcc-4.2.0 ever hitting stable, just opening up the
> testers so gcc-4.2.1 will be smooth

FWIW, I've only a single package not compiling on 4.2.0 now, and you 
already know about it (the kdesvn one I mentioned that you already 
reopened the bug on, that you hadn't been aware of earlier).  With 600+ 
packages merged and 4.2 isn't even in ~arch yet, that's pretty 
impressive, IMO. =8^)  You and Ryan have been doing good work. =8^)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-dev]  Re: glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  4:08 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch Mike Frysinger
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-07-06 18:45 ` Adam James
@ 2007-07-07  1:44 ` Ryan Hill
  2007-07-07  2:10   ` Mike Frysinger
  2007-07-07  8:35   ` Andreas Proschofsky
  2007-07-07  7:38 ` [gentoo-dev] " Kumba
  2007-07-07  9:58 ` Christian Heim
  12 siblings, 2 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Hill @ 2007-07-07  1:44 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike

Now that the futimens patch is in coreutils, i heartily endorse this
event or product.

BTW, the GCC 4.2 porting tracker is bug #162167.  If you find any
crazyass bugs, please block the tracker bug.  Openoffice team, you may
want to examine the patch in bug #184054.

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162167

-- 
dirtyepic                 salesman said this vacuum's guaranteed
 gentoo org          it could suck an ancient virus from the sea
  9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3  5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8)

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-07  1:44 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
@ 2007-07-07  2:10   ` Mike Frysinger
  2007-07-07  8:35   ` Andreas Proschofsky
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2007-07-07  2:10 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 467 bytes --]

On Friday 06 July 2007, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
>
> Now that the futimens patch is in coreutils, i heartily endorse this
> event or product.

and cpio/tar/gzip ... my guess is there may be one more lurking, but i have -e 
world running on ia64 and havent hit another yet
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  4:08 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch Mike Frysinger
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-07-07  1:44 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
@ 2007-07-07  7:38 ` Kumba
  2007-07-07  9:58 ` Christian Heim
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Kumba @ 2007-07-07  7:38 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike

FYI, seems one of the R10K patches fails for mips after all (compile failure 
below).  Probably a define that shifted and I'll have to go trace it down.  So 
no unstable for us for now.


../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a
libbackend.a(options.o):(.data.rel.ro+0x4774): undefined reference to 
`TARGET_R10K_SPECEX'
libbackend.a(options.o):(.data.rel.ro+0x4914): undefined reference to 
`TARGET_R10K_SPECEX'
libbackend.a(options.o):(.data.rel.ro+0x4934): undefined reference to 
`TARGET_R10K_SPECEX'
libbackend.a(mips.o): In function `check_p_pattern_for_store':
mips.c:(.text+0x3520): undefined reference to `TARGET_R10K_SPECEX'
libbackend.a(mips.o): In function `mips_reorg':
mips.c:(.text+0x6a64): undefined reference to `TARGET_R10K_SPECEX'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [cc1-dummy] Error 1


--Kumba

-- 
Gentoo/MIPS Team Lead

"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands 
do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere."  --Elrond
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-07  1:44 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
  2007-07-07  2:10   ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2007-07-07  8:35   ` Andreas Proschofsky
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Proschofsky @ 2007-07-07  8:35 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 342 bytes --]

On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 19:44 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> BTW, the GCC 4.2 porting tracker is bug #162167.  If you find any
> crazyass bugs, please block the tracker bug.  Openoffice team, you may
> want to examine the patch in bug #184054.

This is fixed now.

bye
Andreas

-- 
Andreas Proschofsky
Gentoo Developer / OpenOffice.org

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
  2007-07-06  4:08 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch Mike Frysinger
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-07-07  7:38 ` [gentoo-dev] " Kumba
@ 2007-07-07  9:58 ` Christian Heim
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Christian Heim @ 2007-07-07  9:58 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: Mike Frysinger

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 912 bytes --]

On Friday 06 July 2007 06:08:43 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike

As Adam already pointed/asked earlier, are we going to see Kevin's work being 
merged with gcc-4.2 ? Or are we ever going to see hardened supoprt for 
gcc-4 ?

I really appreciate your effort on doing gcc (and the whole lotta of other 
things you maintain), but we're (as in the hardened folks) getting rather 
impatient. It's been sitting on your plate for about a month (or is it 
two ?). If you can't do it yourself, please tell us. I think we have the 
resources to merge it into the tree ourselves.

Thanks and kind regards, 

   Christian

-- 
Christian Heim <phreak at gentoo.org>
GPG key ID: 9A9F68E6
Fingerprint: AEC4 87B8 32B8 4922 B3A9 DF79 CAE3 556F 9A9F 68E6

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-07 10:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-06  4:08 [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch Mike Frysinger
2007-07-06  4:21 ` Jim Ramsay
2007-07-06  4:43   ` Mike Frysinger
2007-07-06  5:18     ` Jim Ramsay
2007-07-06  5:37 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-07-06  8:09 ` Petteri Räty
2007-07-06  9:48   ` George Shapovalov
2007-07-06 10:33   ` Robert Buchholz
2007-07-06 10:21 ` Luca Barbato
2007-07-06 10:53   ` Andrew Gaffney
2007-07-06 15:11   ` Mike Frysinger
2007-07-06 15:21     ` Luca Barbato
2007-07-06 19:20   ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-07-06 11:33 ` Samuli Suominen
2007-07-06 12:06 ` Roy Marples
2007-07-06 14:58 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2007-07-06 15:13   ` Mike Frysinger
2007-07-06 17:52     ` Duncan
2007-07-06 17:03 ` [gentoo-dev] " Harald van Dijk
2007-07-06 17:32   ` Mike Frysinger
2007-07-07  0:21     ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2007-07-06 18:25 ` [gentoo-dev] " Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
2007-07-06 18:33   ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2007-07-06 18:43   ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2007-07-06 18:45 ` Adam James
2007-07-07  1:44 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2007-07-07  2:10   ` Mike Frysinger
2007-07-07  8:35   ` Andreas Proschofsky
2007-07-07  7:38 ` [gentoo-dev] " Kumba
2007-07-07  9:58 ` Christian Heim

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox