From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I6zCA-0005lp-3W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 01:34:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l671Xho1025817; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 01:33:43 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l671Vnne023597 for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 01:31:49 GMT Received: from localhost (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5BB651C1; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 01:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:32:43 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: 1i5t5.duncan@cox.net Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Feedback req: Confirm/thank on bug fix or is that unwanted bug spam? Message-ID: <20070706183243.7ba334cf@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_j9v0CFQDvhilGFUGhubJWV.; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: e451bbb8-19c0-440a-b6e1-e400c2f24893 X-Archives-Hash: 1c3c36954a196a8213f9342d9363a3e4 --Sig_j9v0CFQDvhilGFUGhubJWV. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 00:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed, I often feel like > adding a thanks to the bug. However, while it may be polite in other=20 > circumstances, in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've=20 > hesitated. Thanks isn't spam to me ... we don't get enough of it, and it's certainly worth an email or two per bug. Thanks, Donnie --Sig_j9v0CFQDvhilGFUGhubJWV. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGju0/XVaO67S1rtsRAqdpAJ90EpKQgSofMtiPDj1ZoUbO5X4TPgCeK5nd 09cxnLeInBDPpCOq2n7czio= =d4L2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_j9v0CFQDvhilGFUGhubJWV.-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list