From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I6sqe-0003GC-IR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:48:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l66IjPaj003235; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:45:25 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l66If5Br028658 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:41:06 GMT Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6228A64CF2 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:41:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:43:13 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200707060008.44389.vapier@gentoo.org> <468E8904.3050602@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <468E8904.3050602@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6315038.ZGJOM7YZuG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200707061443.14144.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 2933a9cf-bab8-4f36-a409-4899c91bcb56 X-Archives-Hash: 030dbfe5cb20858911e4c609b8ccbb86 --nextPart6315038.ZGJOM7YZuG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 06 July 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > > in the next day or so > > From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use glibc2.5 > for now". Emacs herd seems to be in hiding, so I haven't been able to > confirm with them. this is due to some malloc changes which we already addressed in our ebuild= by=20 snipping the relevant upstream fix =2Dmike --nextPart6315038.ZGJOM7YZuG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARo6NQkFjO5/oN/WBAQIVOA/+Kt94vCyZCHWFLPE4VAurUjrsNoozj6/t Qb9zU5eJB8FGCA1hBUI/LUUbikj0nVxMKlo2TeGcnlrzjQNJVBImWOpvl/31u0w4 d0dzbXnKOj+00UT3TfnJu1qulsvV4iGOBKVS1dAutgGmFMNcVX3eWUixAoqHpdMS /y7b05HhsZZEZPJE7wL9ag9ln4bZtQGVNk1GeR53Tic0zTXPY87pV/RyfnQfRTyw 8mW4umNO+Wge8u4IUoPXtY12HgMGS2EdKbc669xtnuOjTjzYFSLS1AS0wTNYb5TK wKeT7j2623IvWojNPlpJaiSmPDJYG3PraGcrs3Gd67slEDXYQHAWLsz0RKIMM0PL dfuPG+Hs0RpoaZ2DMCw0OJNgTuQYYFRN1/lLwRKF1fRrJ2dZkkbFJFGBwTceyLIz O6ywbuvNviG1HqjM9m7uyDC4S2QGKDpE5wlYJVukfeuMCR4XdMToRrBOdFkfe0aM HrSBbzkWARYGt1Ov5uI+i8f/1DajpK03yDbmIO+FwNofg+EoyK/sR4dTjGqmRBey hQUAcN/QESJQovzOgG4XvixroBIEj1SOpqu0lCAo1il/Im9IiCFwVUsCOHTH2A74 i+0FSwtO+A8sa3Qd7NeWQg/QaQxwG1TmvBc0XrseKiw3v5DnK+iM0YipZy8FMokT a+FjY3LKH+I= =iZkN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6315038.ZGJOM7YZuG-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list