[gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 150 bytes --]

get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Jim Ramsay]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 302 bytes --]

Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86

Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump?

-- 
Jim Ramsay
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm)

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 302 bytes --]

On Friday 06 July 2007, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
>
> Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump?

no
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Jim Ramsay]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 264 bytes --]

Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Friday 06 July 2007, Jim Ramsay wrote:
>
> > Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump?
>
> no

And there was great rejoicing.

-- 
Jim Ramsay
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm)

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 239 bytes --]

On Friday 06 July 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so

sorry, forgot about ~ia64 as well
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Petteri Räty]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 331 bytes --]

Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike

About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of course
switch not used by default so that's ok.

Regards,
Petteri


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[George Shapovalov]

Friday, 6. July 2007, Petteri Räty Ви написали:
> Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> > get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of course
> switch not used by default so that's ok.
If this makes people any happier - I had gnat-gcc-4.2.0 in the tree and ~arch 
(x86, amd64 and ppc) since when it came out, (that is approx 2 or 3 month 
now?) without any problems reported. That means technically gcc-4.2.0 with 
Ada support. However this does *not* clash with system gcc, so only Ada stuff 
was tested. Nonetheless, as I said, I did not get any 4.2.0 specific problem 
reports. Seemed to be a rather smooth ride so far..

George
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Robert Buchholz]

On Friday, 6. July 2007 10:09, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> > get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
> > -mike
>
> About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of
> course switch not used by default so that's ok.

Debian is going to 4.2 in unstable these days too and they already found 
and fixed a lot of bugs. You can view a list of current and fixed ones 
here:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.2;users=tbm@cyrius.com

A lot of the bugs are already quite old and might be fixed upstream 
already.

Robert
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Luca Barbato]

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike

gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?

I'll give a test on ppc* soonish.

lu

-- 

Luca Barbato

Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Andrew Gaffney]

Luca Barbato wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
>> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
>> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
>> in the next day or so
>> -mike
> 
> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?

I see they got around to adding the -fno-rape-house-or-burn-pet flag.

-- 
Andrew Gaffney                                 http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
Gentoo Linux Developer             Catalyst/Installer + x86 release coordinator
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 551 bytes --]

On Friday 06 July 2007, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
>
> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
>
> I'll give a test on ppc* soonish.

i wasnt going to add ~ppc because of 179218, but i remember now that the bug 
is for ppc64 only and i've been using gcc-4.2.0 on my quad since i added 
it ... so i'll toss ~ppc into gcc-4.2.0 as well
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Luca Barbato]

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 06 July 2007, Luca Barbato wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
>>> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
>>> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
>>> in the next day or so
>> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
>>
>> I'll give a test on ppc* soonish.
> 
> i wasnt going to add ~ppc because of 179218, but i remember now that the bug 
> is for ppc64 only and i've been using gcc-4.2.0 on my quad since i added 
> it ... so i'll toss ~ppc into gcc-4.2.0 as well
> -mike

gcc-4.3 works fine on ppc64 so far ^^;

lu

-- 

Luca Barbato

Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Donnie Berkholz]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 230 bytes --]

Luca Barbato wrote:
> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
> 
> I'll give a test on ppc* soonish.

I've been using it on x86 and ppc32 (ibook g4) for a week or two with no
issues.

Thanks,
Donnie


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Samuli Suominen]

On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:08:43 -0400
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:

> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike

-DRAC-WAS-HERE == -O4 now?
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Roy Marples]

On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 00:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so

Been using it for a few weeks on ~x86-fbsd without issue now.
Any chance you could add a patch [1] to it though that affects loops and
-O2?

Thanks

Roy

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32500

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Duncan]

Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> posted
200707060008.44389.vapier@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on  Fri, 06 Jul
2007 00:08:43 -0400:

> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so

Could you reopen bug #179744 (kdesvn amd64 -fPIC issue) and add it to the 
4.2 tracker?  I didn't file it so can't, but it's definitely 4.2 related.

(As mentioned there, there's a kdesvn-0.12.1 upstream that's not in-tree 
yet, but I just tested it and it doesn't solve the issue.)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 210 bytes --]

On Friday 06 July 2007, Duncan wrote:
> Could you reopen bug #179744 (kdesvn amd64 -fPIC issue) and add it to the
> 4.2 tracker?  I didn't file it so can't, but it's definitely 4.2 related.

done, cheers
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Duncan]

Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> posted
200707061113.31272.vapier@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on  Fri, 06 Jul
2007 11:13:30 -0400:

>> Could you reopen bug #179744 (kdesvn amd64 -fPIC issue) and add it to
>> the 4.2 tracker?  I didn't file it so can't, but it's definitely 4.2
>> related.
> 
> done, cheers

Thanks. =8^)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Harald van Dijk]

On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:08:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so

Why 4.2.0 rather than 4.2.1 RC1? Are there problems with the RC, or are
all important patches since 4.2.0 added by the ebuild already?
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 809 bytes --]

On Friday 06 July 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:08:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
>
> Why 4.2.0 rather than 4.2.1 RC1? Are there problems with the RC, or are
> all important patches since 4.2.0 added by the ebuild already?

Gentoo hasnt done RC's in a long time and i didnt really have any plans to 
start ... the toolchain overlay contains ebuilds for all weekly snaps

ive added patches to gcc-4.2.0 based on initial testing from all you ricers 
out there and with the help of Ryan Hill

i dont plan on gcc-4.2.0 ever hitting stable, just opening up the testers so 
gcc-4.2.1 will be smooth
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Duncan]

Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> posted
200707061332.28490.vapier@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on  Fri, 06 Jul
2007 13:32:27 -0400:

> i dont plan on gcc-4.2.0 ever hitting stable, just opening up the
> testers so gcc-4.2.1 will be smooth

FWIW, I've only a single package not compiling on 4.2.0 now, and you 
already know about it (the kdesvn one I mentioned that you already 
reopened the bug on, that you hadn't been aware of earlier).  With 600+ 
packages merged and 4.2 isn't even in ~arch yet, that's pretty 
impressive, IMO. =8^)  You and Ryan have been doing good work. =8^)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Marijn Schouten (hkBst)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike

- From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use glibc2.5 for
now". Emacs herd seems to be in hiding, so I haven't been able to confirm with
them.

Marijn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGjokEp/VmCx0OL2wRAvS0AKCKJVbzUlK8X49G+qL57RVkbFDLpgCgo2dv
ktrumqwQGI/paU06eL2p5hg=
=I8cX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Christian Faulhammer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 418 bytes --]

"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <hkBst@gentoo.org>:

> - From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use
> glibc2.5 for now". Emacs herd seems to be in hiding, so I haven't
> been able to confirm with them.

 We are old-school and don't hang around on IRC.  We are very
responsive to bug reports and emails...

V-Li

-- 
http://www.gentoo.org/
http://www.faulhammer.org/
http://www.gnupg.org/

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 545 bytes --]

On Friday 06 July 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
>
> From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use glibc2.5
> for now". Emacs herd seems to be in hiding, so I haven't been able to
> confirm with them.

this is due to some malloc changes which we already addressed in our ebuild by 
snipping the relevant upstream fix
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Adam James]

On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:08:43 -0400
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:

> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so

Will we see the hardened gcc-4 patchset included in this?

--atj
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Ryan Hill]

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike

Now that the futimens patch is in coreutils, i heartily endorse this
event or product.

BTW, the GCC 4.2 porting tracker is bug #162167.  If you find any
crazyass bugs, please block the tracker bug.  Openoffice team, you may
want to examine the patch in bug #184054.

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162167

-- 
dirtyepic                 salesman said this vacuum's guaranteed
 gentoo org          it could suck an ancient virus from the sea
  9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3  5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8)

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 467 bytes --]

On Friday 06 July 2007, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
>
> Now that the futimens patch is in coreutils, i heartily endorse this
> event or product.

and cpio/tar/gzip ... my guess is there may be one more lurking, but i have -e 
world running on ia64 and havent hit another yet
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Andreas Proschofsky]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 342 bytes --]

On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 19:44 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> BTW, the GCC 4.2 porting tracker is bug #162167.  If you find any
> crazyass bugs, please block the tracker bug.  Openoffice team, you may
> want to examine the patch in bug #184054.

This is fixed now.

bye
Andreas

-- 
Andreas Proschofsky
Gentoo Developer / OpenOffice.org

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Kumba]

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike

FYI, seems one of the R10K patches fails for mips after all (compile failure 
below).  Probably a define that shifted and I'll have to go trace it down.  So 
no unstable for us for now.


../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a
libbackend.a(options.o):(.data.rel.ro+0x4774): undefined reference to 
`TARGET_R10K_SPECEX'
libbackend.a(options.o):(.data.rel.ro+0x4914): undefined reference to 
`TARGET_R10K_SPECEX'
libbackend.a(options.o):(.data.rel.ro+0x4934): undefined reference to 
`TARGET_R10K_SPECEX'
libbackend.a(mips.o): In function `check_p_pattern_for_store':
mips.c:(.text+0x3520): undefined reference to `TARGET_R10K_SPECEX'
libbackend.a(mips.o): In function `mips_reorg':
mips.c:(.text+0x6a64): undefined reference to `TARGET_R10K_SPECEX'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [cc1-dummy] Error 1


--Kumba

-- 
Gentoo/MIPS Team Lead

"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands 
do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere."  --Elrond
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

[Christian Heim]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 912 bytes --]

On Friday 06 July 2007 06:08:43 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaaaaaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike

As Adam already pointed/asked earlier, are we going to see Kevin's work being 
merged with gcc-4.2 ? Or are we ever going to see hardened supoprt for 
gcc-4 ?

I really appreciate your effort on doing gcc (and the whole lotta of other 
things you maintain), but we're (as in the hardened folks) getting rather 
impatient. It's been sitting on your plate for about a month (or is it 
two ?). If you can't do it yourself, please tell us. I think we have the 
resources to merge it into the tree ourselves.

Thanks and kind regards, 

   Christian

-- 
Christian Heim <phreak at gentoo.org>
GPG key ID: 9A9F68E6
Fingerprint: AEC4 87B8 32B8 4922 B3A9 DF79 CAE3 556F 9A9F 68E6

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]