From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I18pf-0005v2-AF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:39:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5KMcHFd007877; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:38:17 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5KMa9BW005349 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:36:10 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7540E8D3F8 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:54:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18489-10 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:54:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.57.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D21F8D305 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:54:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:35:41 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] how to handle sensitive files when generating binary packages Message-ID: <20070620233541.1a3ffa00@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <1182378692.21577.4.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> References: <200706200047.04951.vapier@gentoo.org> <200706201627.27790.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070620213546.0352ca85@snowflake> <200706201654.35042.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070620220142.629252a4@snowflake> <1182378692.21577.4.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_JUPEOVhmInCRSDkcfoXvlH9; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 83791c73-f8e5-47b5-b70f-27d5b9541cf0 X-Archives-Hash: f4bdc4e48f301650f2c66ea20f7014a0 --Sig_JUPEOVhmInCRSDkcfoXvlH9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:31:32 -0700 Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 22:01 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > The specific underlying question being, what are the use cases for > > binary packages? >=20 > Ever managed a network of multiple Gentoo identical Gentoo machines? That's one use case, yes. Now what are the others? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_JUPEOVhmInCRSDkcfoXvlH9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGeau996zL6DUtXhERAvdUAJ9/bZFVrkQvyOjZSqvwOlFYjFRb5ACfalVT cDlQclkOUhpfrpihYtpyCgw= =fgNn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_JUPEOVhmInCRSDkcfoXvlH9-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list