From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I17id-0003Xk-EE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:28:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5KLQCxE018274; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:26:12 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5KLNJot013832 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:23:19 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36E48D3F9 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:42:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18071-10 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:41:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.57.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963FE8D3F8 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:41:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:22:30 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] how to handle sensitive files when generating binary packages Message-ID: <20070620222230.72bdbc70@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <200706201719.01571.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <200706200047.04951.vapier@gentoo.org> <200706201654.35042.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070620220142.629252a4@snowflake> <200706201719.01571.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_v1kBf88hzQa_QxdMx14ohSV; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 113e10a6-f475-4394-9523-d11be781f50d X-Archives-Hash: 25e94fa26cd037b3803c7ee314ff2fb2 --Sig_v1kBf88hzQa_QxdMx14ohSV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:19:01 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > The specific underlying question being, what are the use cases for > > binary packages? >=20 > the use of the binpkg is not an issue, it's the creation ... people > blindly creating tbz2's which could contain their sensitive files and > posting them Use cases include all aspects of use, including creation. The way binary packages are now appears to be far from ideal for any plausible use case I can think up, which is why I'm wondering whether there's a better way forward than just adding in another hack. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_v1kBf88hzQa_QxdMx14ohSV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGeZqW96zL6DUtXhERAjRwAKCuLDUqJ4Ea/VV/VWtuMQq3xp+0GgCgj051 YEAEUHkHTvDV92ZMs4GtyTA= =hQVP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_v1kBf88hzQa_QxdMx14ohSV-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list