From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I17Nh-0000iv-AH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:06:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5KL4ZPJ001034; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:04:35 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5KL2AxL030728 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:02:10 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175448D3F9 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:21:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18071-08 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:20:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.57.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD1D8D305 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:20:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:01:42 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] how to handle sensitive files when generating binary packages Message-ID: <20070620220142.629252a4@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <200706201654.35042.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <200706200047.04951.vapier@gentoo.org> <200706201627.27790.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070620213546.0352ca85@snowflake> <200706201654.35042.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_P53Y0D1V=erc91QYK7Wr+Zd"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 417c4c84-3dbd-4505-bece-65e1a4323e4e X-Archives-Hash: 6d002bb581905502e8c5e14f25da7711 --Sig_P53Y0D1V=erc91QYK7Wr+Zd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:54:34 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 20 June 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > being able to generate binary packages that actually reflect the > > > live $ROOT is desirable > > > > Is being able to generate redistributable binary packages that > > reflect the live ROOT desirable? >=20 > that's a feature that exists now that there's no reason to > disable ... not that it can be disabled I'm not suggesting forcibly disabling it, merely marking binary packages as "designed for distribution" or "not designed for distribution", not accepting the latter on other systems and requiring explicit user action to turn the latter into the former. The specific underlying question being, what are the use cases for binary packages? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_P53Y0D1V=erc91QYK7Wr+Zd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGeZW296zL6DUtXhERAmP+AKCoyiOAIcGlgql1cQ27uq6lsr/ndACbBojU wEoLQEDAbG9XXZOZSN2RxQs= =5cs9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_P53Y0D1V=erc91QYK7Wr+Zd-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list