From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I17J4-00068T-PO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:01:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5KL0bR9029459; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:00:37 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5KKuPns021877 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:56:26 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5988D3F8 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:15:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17791-09 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:15:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.57.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040F68D305 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:15:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:55:58 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] how to handle sensitive files when generating binary packages Message-ID: <20070620215558.53d22281@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <1182372530.12859.4.camel@localhost> References: <200706200047.04951.vapier@gentoo.org> <200706201557.56872.vapier@gentoo.org> <46798B9C.2080505@gentoo.org> <200706201627.27790.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070620213546.0352ca85@snowflake> <1182372530.12859.4.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_2_rGN__wjr2/07YWV9NQm71"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: ef4c2645-0929-4f20-87ec-d328df36b9f4 X-Archives-Hash: 621c3a146621254e640664c5631f2068 --Sig_2_rGN__wjr2/07YWV9NQm71 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:48:50 -0400 Olivier Cr=C3=AAte wrote: > On Wed, 2007-20-06 at 21:35 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:27:27 -0400 > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > being able to generate binary packages that actually reflect the > > > live $ROOT is desirable > >=20 > > Is being able to generate redistributable binary packages that > > reflect the live ROOT desirable? >=20 > Yes, it is, if you want to redistribute them to trusted parties (like > other computers you own). Is this use case better served by install-time-generated binary packages with a way of modifying the contents? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_2_rGN__wjr2/07YWV9NQm71 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGeZRe96zL6DUtXhERAlzoAJ0VodADZaDZQ7jCJX6oeZ8yCMb+mgCffxdr cqBB6XtQ+uOnZxEKTtyEjw0= =hdUT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_2_rGN__wjr2/07YWV9NQm71-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list