From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I16rY-0003X4-Ht for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:33:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5KKUb0h032613; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:30:37 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5KKQM6h026085 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:26:23 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE78C8D3F8 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:45:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17791-02 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:45:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.57.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FBD8D305 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:45:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:25:55 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] how to handle sensitive files when generating binary packages Message-ID: <20070620212555.21b99076@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <46798BE2.7040300@gentoo.org> References: <200706200047.04951.vapier@gentoo.org> <1182344680.7336.18.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> <200706201607.07713.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070620211214.0cca11b9@snowflake> <46798BE2.7040300@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_+=4IS1aa+w5LAB5en.90bZu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 303112cd-fc0d-4198-b13d-f471106cf65d X-Archives-Hash: dc5e9d778ae8f3b02b6658e4ed6726fb --Sig_+=4IS1aa+w5LAB5en.90bZu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:19:46 -0500 Andrew Gaffney wrote: > I'm not sure that's really a feasible solution (but then you probably > weren't suggesting it with that intention). Being able to create a > "backup" of any installed package without re-emerging is pretty > handy. Many people use it and there would be a revolt if quickpkg > were removed. Then live-filesystem-generated packages could be marked as 'not for redistribution'. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_+=4IS1aa+w5LAB5en.90bZu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGeY1T96zL6DUtXhERAjIoAJ0Zm5uU/Wvg7IvAzz9xJbArHE/RjACfdzdJ u7P+sqaQUkrYO5MFEV/bCkU= =53dq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_+=4IS1aa+w5LAB5en.90bZu-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list