public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: _JusSx_ <jussx0@yahoo.it>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 16:06:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070617140632.GB7280@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46701D06.5080302@gentoo.org>

On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:36:22PM +0100, Gustavo Felisberto wrote:
> A little background info: Right now there are three versions of
> net-im/skype in the tree:
> 
> 1 - the 1.2 series (with a stable version)
> 2- the 1.3 series also with a stable version
> 3- the 1.4 series with a ~/hardmask version
> 
> Also the skype license states that we cannot mirror it's files (this
> will be need later)
> 
> The 1.4 series will have a version released soon that skype wants to
> become the standard stable version, it has many new features and better
> audio quality.
> 
> I as Gentoo Dev and Skype Betatester was informed that starting on June
> 19th Skype will no longer provide downloads for the 1.2 and 1.3 version,
> and that means that 1.4 will be released some time before. For Gentoo
> that means that starting from the 19th users on the stable profile will
> not be able to install skype as no files will be available from upstream.
> 
> So the thing is, as soon as Skype releases the 1.4 stable version I'm
> going to have it in tree and we need to have it tested ASAP on the
> stable profile. My thing is with the time between, we will have 5 days
> tops or users will not be able to install.
> 
> Suggestions:
> 1- in the 19th remove skype < 1.4 from the tree
> 2- Make < 1.4 ebuilds "empty" and leave them on the tree and ewarn the
> users to use the unstable skype
> 
> 
> The first option will trigger portage errors and prompt users to open
> bugs until we have a stable 1.4, the second gives us a chance to explain
> the issue.
> 
> Any alternatives?
> 
> -- 
> Gustavo Felisberto
> (HumpBack)
> Web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~humpback
> Blog: http://blog.felisberto.net/
> ------------
> It's most certainly GNU/Linux, not Linux. Read more at
> http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html .
> -------------
> 
> 
Let's remove it from portage. why should we use it? I run it for a bit I
can say it's awful... it is closed-source, is not it? so I think it's
better not to install it...



-- 
Linux is only free if your time has no value

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-17 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-13 16:36 [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree Gustavo Felisberto
2007-06-13 16:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2007-06-13 16:49   ` Steev Klimaszewski
2007-06-13 18:26     ` Petteri Räty
2007-06-13 19:44   ` Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
2007-06-13 19:58   ` Abhay Kedia
2007-06-13 20:12     ` Luca Barbato
2007-06-13 20:24     ` Vlastimil Babka
2007-06-13 20:36       ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-13 20:44         ` Vlastimil Babka
2007-06-13 22:23       ` Abhay Kedia
2007-06-14  7:01         ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-14 10:11           ` [gentoo-dev] Keeping closed source pkgs (Was: Re: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree) Steve Long
2007-06-14 11:11             ` Philip Webb
2007-06-14 14:48         ` [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree Luca Barbato
2007-06-14 15:11           ` Abhay Kedia
2007-06-14 21:45             ` Doug Goldstein
2007-06-15  4:31               ` Abhay Kedia
2007-06-15 11:15                 ` Jan Kundrát
2007-06-15 13:03                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2007-06-15 19:23                     ` Richard Freeman
2007-06-17 19:05                       ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-06-18 18:34                         ` Chris Gianelloni
2007-06-19  2:32                           ` [gentoo-dev] Determining ebuild stability and the 30 day suggestion (was: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree) Mart Raudsepp
2007-06-19  4:40                             ` [gentoo-dev] Determining ebuild stability and the 30 day suggestion Luis Francisco Araujo
2007-06-19 21:05                               ` Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
2007-06-19 22:33                             ` [gentoo-dev] Determining ebuild stability and the 30 day suggestion (was: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree) Chris Gianelloni
2007-06-13 16:49 ` [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree Daniel Gryniewicz
2007-06-13 17:53   ` George Shapovalov
2007-06-13 18:28     ` Vlastimil Babka
2007-06-15 15:17       ` Jean-Marc Hengen
2007-06-15 13:45 ` Josh Sled
2007-06-17 14:06 ` _JusSx_ [this message]
2007-06-17 18:41   ` Josh Saddler
2007-06-17 19:08     ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-06-18  8:58       ` Duncan
2007-06-18 18:50         ` Chris Gianelloni
2007-06-18 20:25           ` Duncan
2007-06-17 19:10   ` [gentoo-dev] " Stephen Bennett
2007-06-18  5:01     ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-06-18 14:30       ` Steev Klimaszewski
2007-06-18 15:10         ` Steev Klimaszewski
2007-06-18 22:34           ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-06-18 18:39       ` [gentoo-dev] " Chris Gianelloni
2007-06-18 19:11         ` Wernfried Haas
2007-06-18 19:42           ` Daniel Ostrow
2007-06-18 22:49         ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-06-18 23:45           ` Chris Gianelloni
2007-06-19  1:54             ` Andrew Gaffney
2007-06-19  5:03               ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Pony Colour Schemes [was: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree] Ryan Hill
2007-06-19  6:14                 ` Josh Saddler
2007-06-19  7:29                 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-19 21:07             ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree Steve Long
2007-06-19  0:45           ` [gentoo-dev] " Seemant Kulleen
2007-06-19  5:31           ` Abhay Kedia
2007-06-19  7:25           ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-21 22:37       ` [gentoo-dev] " Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070617140632.GB7280@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jussx0@yahoo.it \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox