From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-24272-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1Hy3zu-00089Z-FA
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:53:15 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5CAoNT0023287;
	Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:50:23 GMT
Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5CAknGB017993
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:46:50 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799A88D30C
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:17:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 05387-06 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:17:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from posidon.ferdyx.org (posidon.ferdyx.org [192.168.0.2])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C509B8D305
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:17:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by posidon.ferdyx.org (nbSMTP-1.01-cvs) for uid 1000
	(using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	ferdy@gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:46:43 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:46:41 +0200
From: "Fernando J. Pereda" <ferdy@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild
	from stable tree
Message-ID: <20070612104641.GE4738@ferdyx.org>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <C29EC904-37E4-4487-97F6-46EB69DDD8AF@cilly.mine.nu> <20070612100139.GA4738@ferdyx.org> <466E772F.6010807@thefreemanclan.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vmttodhTwj0NAgWp"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <466E772F.6010807@thefreemanclan.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org
X-Archives-Salt: 7b3526f7-a83a-4b42-abba-ee9691a43713
X-Archives-Hash: 7f00ee6320dea674c43d107a28a6f5d1


--vmttodhTwj0NAgWp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:36:31AM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
>  Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> > Some of the packages I maintain are better removed when a new
> > maintenance version is released. And I plan to keep it that way :)
>=20
>  Can you clarify this?  What scenarios do you run into where it isn't goo=
d=20
>  for stable users to have access to more than one version of the software?

Known to be buggy versions.

- ferdy

--=20
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimart=EDn
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED  ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4

--vmttodhTwj0NAgWp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGbnmRCkhbDGC9KNQRAhaEAJ9/GgpX8yUGSxeJAFJMu0CqD77tVwCeITjE
O4LaiUgfpUIDqCr7fvZMLmc=
=Dqwb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vmttodhTwj0NAgWp--

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list