Re: [gentoo-dev] Do not modify ebuilds which are already in the tree... even if masked

["Fernando J. Pereda" <ferdy@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1101 bytes --]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 12:07:11PM +0200, cilly wrote:
>  Hi all,
> 
>  I think it is worth to discuss about `Do not modify ebuilds which are
>  already in the tree... even if masked.`
> 
>  Sometimes ebuilds which are already in the portage tree are modified
>  without changing the version-number, i.e. ebuild-r1 is in the portage
>  tree and the ebuild-r1 gets changed, i.e. useflag or other issues
>  without changing the version number to ebuild-r2. This causes
>  confusion i.e. in bug-reports.
> 
>  My opinion is not to change any ebuild which is in the portage tree,
>  even if the ebuild is masked.  I think the better way is to add an
>  ebuild with an updated version number, even if the ebuild is still
>  masked.
> 
>  I also recommend to manage hard-masked packages the same way, it
>  prevents confusion in bug-reports.
> 
>  What do you think?

I think this is also a bad idea. I seem to recall that this is
documented somewhere in the Developer Handbook...

- ferdy

-- 
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED  ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]