From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hwj49-0000mE-7f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 18:20:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l58IIJnL015684; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 18:18:19 GMT Received: from jabbathehutt.spamsuxx.de (jabbathehutt.spamsuxx.de [85.214.64.12]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l58IEoLl010691 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 18:14:50 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jabbathehutt.spamsuxx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA694EC8ED for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 20:14:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at spamsuxx.de Received: from jabbathehutt.spamsuxx.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jabbathehutt.spamsuxx.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sOAeBYz7uHfA for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 20:14:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jabbathehutt.spamsuxx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58AC74EFDCB for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 20:14:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nx9420.middleearth.local (HSI-KBW-085-216-048-236.hsi.kabelbw.de [85.216.48.236]) (Authenticated sender: mail@eliasprobst.eu) by jabbathehutt.spamsuxx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC954EC8ED for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 20:14:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Elias Probst To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Non-Dev Contributors and the Tree Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 20:17:24 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <4667EF71.9010103@gentoo.org> <8cd1ed20706080001g3a58b15ej3ef9fe67d143d80d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8cd1ed20706080001g3a58b15ej3ef9fe67d143d80d@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1998190.xWBRn4Mnyu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200706082017.26988.mail@eliasprobst.eu> X-Archives-Salt: 9f8075ee-2a1f-481a-948a-a6b1ddc000b3 X-Archives-Hash: 3472661b6d4e73c60e2962a87ce10ac5 --nextPart1998190.xWBRn4Mnyu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 08 June 2007 09:01:54 Kent Fredric wrote: > As a non-dev with not a lot of free time, I applaud this suggestion. > However, my core fear is the potential for it becoming subject to > abuse, and people insisting on repeatedly uploading patches that are > not actually wanted / necessary for the project, despite the package > maintainer saying 'dude , stop' Just a ++ for this by me. ;-) Regards, Elias P. =2D-=20 A really nice number: "09:F9:11:02:9D:74:E3:5B:D8:41:56:C5:63:56:88:C0" --nextPart1998190.xWBRn4Mnyu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGaZ00HzenisJbkx8RAk4WAKC/1Gh11WVlqVI/ZAkFRSa3/EAWyACg03Fr E0YaRxuZC12BRu2sotQRqOE= =9dFk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1998190.xWBRn4Mnyu-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list