From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HwNAj-0007SK-Al for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:57:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l57IuPFx022811; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 18:56:25 GMT Received: from blob.mailstation.de (ftp.mailstation.de [87.139.47.139]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l57Is0jl019457 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 18:54:00 GMT Received: from janus.mailstation.de (janus.mailstation.de [192.168.168.10]) by blob.mailstation.de (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l57ItnXP011815 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 20:55:52 +0200 From: "Wulf C. Krueger" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Non-Dev Contributors and the Tree Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 20:51:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <4667EF71.9010103@gentoo.org> <1181239361.15396.63.camel@workbox.quova.com> <46684FBD.7010105@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <46684FBD.7010105@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart31957299.NyltCQp5hf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200706072051.43986.philantrop@gentoo.org> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (blob.mailstation.de [192.168.168.30]); Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:55:52 +0200 (CEST) X-mailstation-de-MailScanner-Information: Scanned using: F-Prot, ClamAv, Bitdefender X-mailstation-de-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-mailstation-de-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.44, required 5, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-mailstation-de-MailScanner-From: philantrop@gentoo.org X-mailstation-de-MailScanner-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: af4866a2-84bc-4965-903e-213e15c4253b X-Archives-Hash: 5659f11303b7032ba5da2c54f74f4efc --nextPart31957299.NyltCQp5hf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday, June 7, 2007 08:34:37 PM Vlastimil Babka wrote: > Well the difference is that AFAIK Sunrise is just for maintainer-wanted > stuff that's not in the tree yet, but Michael talks about (rev)bumps of > stuff that's already in tree. AFAIK, if the maintainer agrees, it's fine to have other stuff in Sunrise,= =20 too.=20 I've tried to get a user maintain a live ebuild there for fvwm for=20 example, taviso agreed to it, Sunrise agreed - it's just the user who's=20 lazy why that's not already reality. :-) > Personally I think that project/herd overlays with non-dev contributors > already work well (at least for Java team) and don't see much benefit > in some overlay for everything. Same here for the KDE overlays. The most active contributor is a user, not= =20 any dev. :-) Best regards, Wulf --nextPart31957299.NyltCQp5hf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGaFO/nuVXRcSi+5oRAgzzAJ43Gu8Td8HuK9eDAv9Bw2y3/5hxegCg3fwp WAFUtkSTJFiBlCDKcPtekTE= =pKpz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart31957299.NyltCQp5hf-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list