From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-24138-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1HwOmp-0003HE-Kt
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:40:52 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l57KdMZO019061;
	Thu, 7 Jun 2007 20:39:22 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l57KaAl9014433
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 20:36:14 GMT
Received: from gentoo.org (unknown [84.29.252.211])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C1F6447A
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  7 Jun 2007 20:33:02 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:21 +0200
From: Harald van =?utf-8?Q?D=C4=B3k?= <truedfx@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PMS] Version Naming Clarification
Message-ID: <20070607203321.GA16428@boostbox.mill1.nb.home.nl>
References: <46680E94.2080705@gentoo.org> <46683328.6010708@gentoo.org> <20070607194245.9b469b5d.genone@gentoo.org> <20070607213207.190d4117@maya>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070607213207.190d4117@maya>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06)
X-Archives-Salt: 35b78d28-0791-4767-bd69-365368a273e9
X-Archives-Hash: b1cfc32e89a608aa526e980d6578e205

On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:31:44PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:42:45 +0200
> Marius Mauch <genone@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > Thing is: if you see sys-fs/ntfs-3g, is that an atom or a CPV? You
> > don't know unless you actually check the tree.
> 
> Is there any place in the tree where a dep atom and a CPV are both
> accepted?

An ebuild's PROVIDE list.

> Should there be?

Probably not.
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list