From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HwGBv-00022J-J7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:30:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l57BSI0X030724; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 11:28:18 GMT Received: from anubis.medic.chalmers.se (anubis.medic.chalmers.se [129.16.30.218]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l57BMrPo021297 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 11:22:57 GMT Received: from localhost (dhcp-248-162.nomad.chalmers.se [129.16.248.162]) (Authenticated sender: buisse) by mail.chalmers.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E171444E for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:22:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:23:06 +0200 From: Alexandre Buisse To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proctors - improve the concept or discard it? Message-ID: <20070607112305.GB2643@ubik> References: <1181074192.12669.16.camel@antares.hausnetz> <20070606152947.GH26971@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> <200706061810.50562.philantrop@gentoo.org> <200706061916.02515.expose@luftgetrock.net> <1181173670.15396.50.camel@workbox.quova.com> <46674C74.8040408@gmail.com> <1181177896.15396.59.camel@workbox.quova.com> <4667DADE.2030101@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="V0207lvV8h4k8FAm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4667DADE.2030101@gmail.com> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.22-rc2-ubik i686 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Archives-Salt: c5ceb5b6-f1ba-4c02-a9d7-1932c65e7f2b X-Archives-Hash: 685141b5f112bd4f2aadddd471581442 --V0207lvV8h4k8FAm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 7, 2007 at 12:20:07 +0200, George Prowse wrote: > [...] before trying to stop a thread=20 > descending into anarchy? I wish it was descending into anarchy. Which is a highly organized social system, and doesn't have anything to do with chaos. Anarchy is just a system where there is no authority which hasn't been freely accepted (and freely as in "you can refuse it without any consequence", not freely as in "you can refuse it but then you won't be part of this project"). So please, let's pay attention to the meaning of the words we are using. /Alexandre --=20 http://aperturefirst.effraie.org --V0207lvV8h4k8FAm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGZ+qZwx9vvAARv2sRAhOzAKDO5RCmDWoPETAE5fhiYstFhWCsBgCgkRr+ yEU2MKIrpCSFATrO0lQ3U8w= =s97Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V0207lvV8h4k8FAm-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list