From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HvyX7-00040o-V4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:38:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l56GbnhI029481; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:37:49 GMT Received: from dd14500.kasserver.com (dd14500.kasserver.com [85.13.135.241]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l56GYVTe024669 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:34:31 GMT Received: from hoshino (unknown [82.139.196.236]) by dd14500.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F86823CA for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 18:34:31 +0200 (CEST) From: expose@luftgetrock.net To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Living in a bubble [gentoo-proctor] Warning^2 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 18:32:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <1181074192.12669.16.camel@antares.hausnetz> <200706061808.30687.expose@luftgetrock.net> <20070606172250.76b44ab4@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <20070606172250.76b44ab4@snowflake> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706061832.18122.expose@luftgetrock.net> X-Archives-Salt: 1f8c5db8-f10b-4c97-ba3a-ce3e6f95ecfd X-Archives-Hash: 35743527055c7395717756185154d3aa Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > expose@luftgetrock.net wrote: > > Just stop claiming others are insane, abusive power-trippers just > > because you did not abide by a rule and got your punishment for it. > > I'm claiming it because plenty of other people agree. You *did* see the > response that the proctors got from various Gentoo developers, right? What I saw was a response to what you as one of the I-will-reply-anyway guys caused, and I bet if people had just stayed quiet for 24 hours the thread would have died out rather quickly. The replys by other devs seem to be allmost exclusivly be based on the fact, that people like you did not take their time calming down, or if they were calm anyway, take their time to do whatever for 24 hours. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list