[gentoo-dev] RFC: new bugzilla resolution: NEEDPATCH

[gentoo-dev] RFC: new bugzilla resolution: NEEDPATCH

[Marius Mauch]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 899 bytes --]

I'm sure I'm not the only one who knows a number of (enhancement) bugs
that are fixable, but the assignee doesn't have the motivation to come
up with a solution, but would look at and eventually include a
user-submitted patch for it. Currently those would either be left open
forever or closed as WONTFIX which isn't compeltely accurate. Therefore
I propose a new bugzilla resolution NEEDPATCH so we're not stuck with
tons of open bugs that might never be closed (or get closed with a
somewhat incorrect resolution). It might also give people who want to
help a simpler target instead of browsing through all open bugs and
trying to find one where a user can work on.

Opinions?

Marius

-- 
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub

In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new bugzilla resolution: NEEDPATCH

[Steve Long]

Well speaking as a user who'd gladly help out with code-fixes for smaller
scale stuff, i think it's a great idea.

a few of the #friendly-coders would be glad to help out as well.

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new bugzilla resolution: NEEDPATCH

[Wulf C. Krueger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 508 bytes --]

On Thursday, May 31, 2007 02:32:22 AM Marius Mauch wrote:
> I'm sure I'm not the only one who knows a number of (enhancement) bugs
> that are fixable, but the assignee doesn't have the motivation to come
> up with a solution, 

... or is lacking the necessary skills. 

> I propose a new bugzilla resolution NEEDPATCH so we're not stuck with
> tons of open bugs that might never be closed

I fully agree. There are quite a few bugs I've seen that would be benefit 
from it.

Best regards, Wulf

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new bugzilla resolution: NEEDPATCH

[Robin H. Johnson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1230 bytes --]

On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:32:22AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> I'm sure I'm not the only one who knows a number of (enhancement) bugs
> that are fixable, but the assignee doesn't have the motivation to come
> up with a solution, but would look at and eventually include a
> user-submitted patch for it. Currently those would either be left open
> forever or closed as WONTFIX which isn't compeltely accurate. Therefore
> I propose a new bugzilla resolution NEEDPATCH so we're not stuck with
> tons of open bugs that might never be closed (or get closed with a
> somewhat incorrect resolution). It might also give people who want to
> help a simpler target instead of browsing through all open bugs and
> trying to find one where a user can work on.
I think a keyword might be more useful, as at least with my bugs, I'd
like to keep them open myself - if the user doesn't provide a patch,
it's still something that I'd get around to doing eventually.

I specifically want my bugs to stay open, and be easily visible as to
why I've kept them open.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer & Council Member
E-Mail     : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 321 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new bugzilla resolution: NEEDPATCH

[Samuli Suominen]

On Wed, 30 May 2007 21:44:08 -0700
"Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > I'm sure I'm not the only one who knows a number of (enhancement)
> > bugs that are fixable, but the assignee doesn't have the motivation
> > to come up with a solution, but would look at and eventually
> I think a keyword might be more useful, as at least with my bugs, I'd
> like to keep them open myself - if the user doesn't provide a patch,
> it's still something that I'd get around to doing eventually.
> 
> I specifically want my bugs to stay open, and be easily visible as to
> why I've kept them open.

I can agree with keyword but closing them because of lacking motivation
or skills isn't justified.. Problem doesn't go away by making them
invisible.

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new bugzilla resolution: NEEDPATCH

[Vlastimil Babka]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:32:22AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
>> I'm sure I'm not the only one who knows a number of (enhancement) bugs
>> that are fixable, but the assignee doesn't have the motivation to come
>> up with a solution, but would look at and eventually include a
>> user-submitted patch for it. Currently those would either be left open
>> forever or closed as WONTFIX which isn't compeltely accurate. Therefore
>> I propose a new bugzilla resolution NEEDPATCH so we're not stuck with
>> tons of open bugs that might never be closed (or get closed with a
>> somewhat incorrect resolution). It might also give people who want to
>> help a simpler target instead of browsing through all open bugs and
>> trying to find one where a user can work on.
> I think a keyword might be more useful, as at least with my bugs, I'd
> like to keep them open myself - if the user doesn't provide a patch,
> it's still something that I'd get around to doing eventually.
> 
> I specifically want my bugs to stay open, and be easily visible as to
> why I've kept them open.

+1 Keyword is a good idea.

- --
Vlastimil Babka (Caster)
Gentoo/Java
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGX04htbrAj05h3oQRAp/0AJ9adU5tYreZ7FG2jTrMXMOeYebRDQCfd5bj
LhneK0sZ4gQkrMSw0oUj0LM=
=xVZ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new bugzilla resolution: NEEDPATCH

[Marius Mauch]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1427 bytes --]

On Wed, 30 May 2007 21:44:08 -0700
"Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:32:22AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > I'm sure I'm not the only one who knows a number of (enhancement)
> > bugs that are fixable, but the assignee doesn't have the motivation
> > to come up with a solution, but would look at and eventually
> > include a user-submitted patch for it. Currently those would either
> > be left open forever or closed as WONTFIX which isn't compeltely
> > accurate. Therefore I propose a new bugzilla resolution NEEDPATCH
> > so we're not stuck with tons of open bugs that might never be
> > closed (or get closed with a somewhat incorrect resolution). It
> > might also give people who want to help a simpler target instead of
> > browsing through all open bugs and trying to find one where a user
> > can work on.
> I think a keyword might be more useful, as at least with my bugs, I'd
> like to keep them open myself - if the user doesn't provide a patch,
> it's still something that I'd get around to doing eventually.

Guess keyword works better for that case and solves the main issue as
well (filtering). So I've added the new keyword "NeedPatch".

Marius

-- 
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub

In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]