From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hqowo-000641-Ku for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 May 2007 11:24:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4NBNALJ006513; Wed, 23 May 2007 11:23:10 GMT Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de (mo-p07-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.189]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4NBLM48004284 for ; Wed, 23 May 2007 11:21:22 GMT Received: from luna.home (dynamic-unidsl-85-197-25-54.westend.de [85.197.25.54]) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo25) (RZmta 6.5) with ESMTP id D042e5j4N8hggk for ; Wed, 23 May 2007 13:21:20 +0200 (MEST) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:21:15 +0200 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking virtuals stable Message-ID: <20070523132115.22686f03@luna.home> In-Reply-To: <46499588.5000003@gentoo.org> References: <17993.36648.37167.198946@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <46499076.6090401@gentoo.org> <17993.37916.578366.696016@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <46499588.5000003@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_FHsoRJxWSiEWpaXaW/lRQOD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-RZG-AUTH: hXn+rC1arvT7Lf9I/zKDqjrgIkrokD1Qxy5bIqfbp9I10BMNL35Kumb7+O8gwT7k1FhhCfY= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 X-Archives-Salt: 11e9da83-b37e-45af-9ddd-5788a6711b20 X-Archives-Hash: b13f82cad8cd16bdaed0bf9e5dd6211f --Sig_FHsoRJxWSiEWpaXaW/lRQOD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Petteri R=E4ty : > The month is not set in stone. About who marks them, it's probably > best to get the opinion of the arch teams. I don't think they will > object to normal developers marking them. Arch teams: what do you > think? Speaking for x86/amd64 and Emacs...I am ok with that. :) V-Li --=20 http://www.gentoo.org/ http://www.faulhammer.org/ http://www.gnupg.org/ --Sig_FHsoRJxWSiEWpaXaW/lRQOD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGVCOrNQqtfCuFneMRAkFjAJwNhPbeH+pTdAceyv8Wfpr5ECDpEQCgm8Mr kOa08SaR+FNqznnowdV1xBs= =QrWH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_FHsoRJxWSiEWpaXaW/lRQOD-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list