public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carsten Lohrke <carlo@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was -> Conversion of Emacs virtual packages
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 01:04:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705170104.53149.carlo@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <464B89C0.3000407@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 283 bytes --]

While I always was for uniq package names, tree-wide, renaming doesn't solve 
anything. Gentoo's binary packages are fundamentally broken. You can't have 
two binary packages of the same ebuild differing e.g. in use flags, 
architecture, toolchain, etc. pp. either.


Carsten

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-16 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-15 10:44 [gentoo-dev] Conversion of Emacs virtual packages Ulrich Mueller
2007-05-15 10:51 ` Jakub Moc
2007-05-15 10:51 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-05-15 11:09   ` Ulrich Mueller
2007-05-15 10:53 ` Jakub Moc
2007-05-15 13:25   ` Ulrich Mueller
2007-05-16 17:19     ` Chris Gianelloni
2007-05-16 21:36       ` Ulrich Mueller
     [not found] ` <46499076.6090401@gentoo.org>
2007-05-15 11:06   ` Ulrich Mueller
2007-05-15 11:12     ` [gentoo-dev] Marking virtuals stable Petteri Räty
2007-05-23 11:21       ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2007-05-30 19:55         ` Ulrich Mueller
2007-05-31  9:28           ` Michael Cummings
2007-05-31 13:36             ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2007-05-31 15:41               ` Graham Murray
2007-05-31 13:52             ` Jeroen Roovers
2007-05-31 16:07               ` Michael Cummings
2007-05-16 17:15 ` [gentoo-dev] Conversion of Emacs virtual packages Chris Gianelloni
2007-05-16 17:52   ` Ulrich Mueller
2007-05-16 20:07     ` Chris Gianelloni
2007-05-16 21:23       ` [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was -> " William L. Thomson Jr.
2007-05-16 22:37         ` Thilo Bangert
2007-05-16 22:46           ` Jakub Moc
2007-05-16 23:04             ` Carsten Lohrke [this message]
2007-05-17  8:54             ` [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name Ulrich Mueller
2007-05-17 10:10               ` Raúl Porcel
2007-05-16 22:59           ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages with same name was -> Conversion of Emacs virtual packages Ali Polatel
2007-05-16 23:45           ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Kelly
2007-05-17  0:19             ` Georgi Georgiev
2007-05-17  7:49         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-05-17 14:59           ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2007-05-17 15:03             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-05-17 16:48               ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2007-05-17 16:53                 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-05-17 17:07                   ` Josh Sled
2007-05-17 17:13                     ` Vlastimil Babka
2007-05-17 17:57                     ` Chris Gianelloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200705170104.53149.carlo@gentoo.org \
    --to=carlo@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox