From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HoSEs-0004E8-Lc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 22:44:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4GMh3Ae006937; Wed, 16 May 2007 22:43:03 GMT Received: from snowy.fizzelpark.com (snowy.fizzelpark.com [85.25.140.198]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4GMdK8t000834 for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 22:39:21 GMT Received: (qmail 1997 invoked from network); 16 May 2007 22:39:20 -0000 Received: from 212.242.130.102 ([212.242.130.102]) by mail.fizzelpark.com ([85.25.252.58]) with ESMTP via SSL; 16 May 2007 22:39:20 -0000 From: Thilo Bangert Organization: Gentoo To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was -> Conversion of Emacs virtual packages Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 00:37:23 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <17993.36648.37167.198946@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <1179346063.7620.4.camel@workbox.quova.com> <1179350638.22964.15.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> In-Reply-To: <1179350638.22964.15.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2086742.mmqBB1JVaW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200705170037.26212.bangert@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 99d4a82a-cf94-40e7-ad22-c430e3a2901b X-Archives-Hash: 1d9cf0156f3721eec0e85f2cd4eda97b --nextPart2086742.mmqBB1JVaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline > > It isn't different. That's the problem. If you have two packages > > with the same name, you have the same problem. > > On that note I would hope the vim/vi peeps would rename. > app-vim/ant and app-vim/sudo > IMHO app-vim/ant should really be app-vim/vim-ant or something other > than just ant. or app-vim/sudo-syntax and app-vim/ant-syntax as there already are a=20 number of ebuilds following that scheme... regards Thilo --nextPart2086742.mmqBB1JVaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGS4emxRElEoA5AncRAoaWAJ9eHjyNx+wMHpaMbUhQxsxbHEp+JACdGHWw QfdScJOlhDGqlBEdGFBcB/0= =7hD3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2086742.mmqBB1JVaW-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list