From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HndlT-0000BV-OB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:51:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4EGoGlb007143; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:50:16 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4EGmGcu004841 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:48:17 GMT Received: from iglu.bnet.local (d070070.adsl.hansenet.de [80.171.70.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC1465111 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:48:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] trial software in portage? Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 18:48:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200705142126.17643.dragonheart@gentoo.org> <200705141647.10990.carlo@gentoo.org> <464878A9.9060305@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <464878A9.9060305@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart58966526.UWCMzCOleC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200705141848.06440.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: bd52532e-49c8-49e9-b812-c72d7fb68941 X-Archives-Hash: 9b912b641d393db881ba2ed9991ab230 --nextPart58966526.UWCMzCOleC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Montag, 14. Mai 2007, Jakub Moc wrote: > As the name unrar suggests, it doesn't *pack* stuff, in only unpacks it. Why do you come with unrar-gpl then. I'd assume the same for it. > So, thanks and leave the thing alone in the tree; and yeah, there are > really people who work w/ .rar stuff still, tar.{gz,bz2} hasn't > dominated the world yet. If there were an issue with distributing the rar package, the usual answer= =20 were to use another archiver, no matter how many people complained. Cratsen --nextPart58966526.UWCMzCOleC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGSJLCVwbzmvGLSW8RAmFsAJ4pAamcy+fZAbmcx0L8a2XhcltsigCdHzTl NVT6IIxl58ImmO+vGSufyhg= =jHoI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart58966526.UWCMzCOleC-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list