From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-23671-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1HnTuZ-0005RZ-OU
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 06:20:00 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4E6J3h7026259;
Mon, 14 May 2007 06:19:03 GMT
Received: from quasar.dynaweb.hu (quasar.dynaweb.hu [195.70.37.87])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4E6H9hj024059
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 14 May 2007 06:17:09 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by quasar.dynaweb.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2ED61000D0;
Mon, 14 May 2007 08:17:08 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at dynaweb.hu
Received: from quasar.dynaweb.hu ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (quasar.dynaweb.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id EmLdmnymfNhA; Mon, 14 May 2007 08:17:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from raketa.ipn.dynaweb.hu (pool-1262.adsl.interware.hu [213.178.104.238])
by quasar.dynaweb.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C427100054;
Mon, 14 May 2007 08:17:06 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 08:17:02 +0200
From: Rumi Szabolcs <rumi_ml@rtfm.hu>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: <vapier@gentoo.org>, <wschlich@gentoo.org>, <mwtzz@yahoo.com>,
<osterhues@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openssh sftplogging patch
Message-Id: <20070514081702.78595f8a.rumi_ml@rtfm.hu>
In-Reply-To: <comment-1179094595-bug-178302-11180@http.bugs.gentoo.org/>
References: <bug-178302-11180@http.bugs.gentoo.org/>
<comment-1179094595-bug-178302-11180@http.bugs.gentoo.org/>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 58b010b0-d8c7-4bed-aca0-7d1c35899943
X-Archives-Hash: 815127538645ddbd038e7932a3eb18e0
Hi,
On Sun, 13 May 2007 22:16:35 +0000
bugzilla-daemon@gentoo.org wrote:
> Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178302
>
>------- Comment #1 from vapier@gentoo.org 2007-05-13 22:16 0000 -------
> hey look i provided an answer there as well:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/44313
Even back then I didn't really know how to interpret that:
"no, get it upgraded upstream"
You mean I should get the OpenSSH people to integrate the
chmod/chown/umask functionality into their mainline sources?
It took them several years to get the logging part integrated,
and they probably have seen the sftplogging patch, did know
that there is that chmod/chown/umask functionality, and they
haven't integrated that for some (to me, unimaginable) reason.
What do you think how long it would take for me or anybody
else to convince them to integrate that as well?
I'm running an sftp fileserver which can only be secured by
using that functionality so I could not upgrade the OpenSSH
on that server for about a year now since the sftplogging
patch has been removed from the ebuild. Do you really think
that we, who are using that functionality, want to wait some
more years for the OpenSSH people to integrate the another
half of the functionality of that patch?
Shouldn't it be done so that you don't just ditch a function
set that is heavily used and depended on by several people
until the upstream folks don't fully integrate it?
I really don't understand the way you're thinking.
Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm stupid, please enlighten me!
Thanks,
Sab
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list