From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HnLxy-0002hp-47 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 May 2007 21:50:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4DLmEqF014352; Sun, 13 May 2007 21:48:14 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4DLgGm2001365 for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 21:42:16 GMT Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC08650F0 for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 21:42:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ion license Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 17:43:14 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <20070512221357.GA6264@pluto.local> In-Reply-To: <20070512221357.GA6264@pluto.local> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1491359.vP9Y7FGKPU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200705131743.15289.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 97b5b1f3-d0da-4370-8f08-c91bf968a111 X-Archives-Hash: 7430412b120b630c496fa8ea29ca1ecf --nextPart1491359.vP9Y7FGKPU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 12 May 2007, Matti Bickel wrote: > recently, there's been some worries about the changes and new > requirements the ion upstream, tuomov, put forth in a new LICENSE for > ion-3. It's main additions are a "timely response clause", which > requires us to get the same keywords for a newly released version as the > previous had within 28 days. Another point is the "no patches" clause, > which prohibits distributions from carrying a "significantly modified" > ion-3 release under the ion name. i'd just rename the package to whatever Debian uses or punt it completely with a masking reason: # upstream is braindead, ask them to get a transplant -mike --nextPart1491359.vP9Y7FGKPU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARkeGc0FjO5/oN/WBAQJ/YxAAzFk0tOyV8UtpJi0kWhKz/PtkAEaKUSru u7cc0Jg2DJXvtGDJlOrRydUv9kSona/Hc6E2jWSAK5RtFSthVJWOWaMuWz3o8vFI yVIr0g/GGC4HzlpjnIFPF47fd1i1zOx5t74jLslR5i20oiaQYSSKzZU+WG5RfMAv BSJYzhDzSH2Tva8ed+dXukc5jUcZ9bAnmsbn/lv1YhjNZ/IqaOIgYZEs4J6qIVRh DhVkmWQKSrJsnCV1XAL6tzm7E4uUJDheSMVrLgEPVRyRJ1Mp9++pWImDWkNAMvuQ gKCgIlFEps6vaYOHUBGom2tPDvnr+KLgdAPBHWI/2GUb2+Jqn13rYSKv5cuBZqKA MGlIrWvwJs31ierBWopYoigb3+JYPDUPywHENNFU+SHEbuN5qRuTVOiutyLoA4xe FU0FTFjB0ivf2FIg6x78EqLQIl10RB5xYRx7RuKRQkAoVKy6MPcP5CnB3Yto3zI/ OVduu1mxibu23d0MT3Ic9qL4FYFE93tuisrQF+tkIYHkZaYCEnDYSCGFgF/FIV2B XnI8LNZbw2tymM3Nna71qAq2M4KxhPb3h4e01oVsFNUZjuOmlvQA7HNHLW9Ss8QS pfJk5egDgpiq6dFN4axXlU9ur2zEdfrR48zUj17uXFcKSUYft2XoUWE91Qw/j31K enTAdTq2lis= =bqev -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1491359.vP9Y7FGKPU-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list