From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hn35H-0006Z3-2s for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 May 2007 01:41:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4D1eL0X025487; Sun, 13 May 2007 01:40:21 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4D1cIYc023000 for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 01:38:18 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53868D30C for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 02:53:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17337-01 for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 02:53:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBE88D305 for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 02:53:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 02:35:59 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ion license Message-ID: <20070513023559.160ec259@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <1179019361.18262.2.camel@tuxhugs> References: <20070512221357.GA6264@pluto.local> <20070513011955.01ffdbba@snowflake> <1179019361.18262.2.camel@tuxhugs> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_gXCzhIUVe612CbUh6XZu7ME; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 2d7aea80-ec27-4068-917f-d272353bef24 X-Archives-Hash: d7e8ee787782c8b077c043ab62206fc9 --Sig_gXCzhIUVe612CbUh6XZu7ME Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 12 May 2007 18:22:41 -0700 Peter Gordon wrote: > Could we not simply rename it, as has been suggested many times thus > far? Then we could mask ion3 and let people know why and what it was > renamed to, et al. Presumably this would require maintaining updated documentation, patches to change the program binary name and configuration paths etc... In which case it should be done as an external fork, not a Gentoo thing. Really, I don't see why there's a need to go out of the way for this. Upstream clearly don't want their package in the tree, and the devmanual [1] says that that wish should be respected. [1]: http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/tree/index.html --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_gXCzhIUVe612CbUh6XZu7ME Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGRmt/96zL6DUtXhERAne8AJ43ZkuIaIM9WVBe3vzVL6MBJzFtJACeKkC1 z8AqUUYAuD9noAHpSRWcJug= =nBgw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_gXCzhIUVe612CbUh6XZu7ME-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list