From: Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Optional Package Dependencies for netscape-flash -> libflashsupport
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 12:12:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070511121210.7a75dfa2@sed-192.sedsystems.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4644AF3F.7030503@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1351 bytes --]
Josh Saddler wrote:
> Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > I suppose I could also propose:
> >
> > 4) netscape-flash just RDEPENDS on libflashsupport all the time.
> > It's certainly not a large library to be added on.
> >
>
> That is a terrible idea. Don't make it "depend" on something that it
> clearly does *not* depend on. Flash works just fine without the
> optional add-ons, and those are *definitely* optional. I've never
> needed libflashsupport and would prefer not seeing useless cruft
> attached to a perfectly working Flash installation.
Point taken - If you don't want the extra features you don't want
libflashsupport at all.
I could make it so that if all of the USE flags for libflashsupport are
turned off it doesn't actually install the library at all, just gets
added to the list of installed packages.
> If you're going to add it to USE, then make sure it's *not* on by
> default, thanks.
This way it will adhere to your current set of global USE flags. If you
have pulseaudio, esd, oss, ssl, or gnutls on globally, it will install
libflashsupport with the appropriate hooks in it. If they are all
off (either globally or specifically for libflashsupport) you will
just get the same old netscape-flash with no add-ons.
Is this a worthy compromise?
--
Jim Ramsay
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm)
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-11 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-10 17:00 [gentoo-dev] Optional Package Dependencies for netscape-flash -> libflashsupport Jim Ramsay
2007-05-10 18:20 ` Patrick McLean
2007-05-10 19:11 ` Olivier Crête
2007-05-11 17:15 ` Jim Ramsay
2007-05-11 18:00 ` Josh Saddler
2007-05-11 18:12 ` Jim Ramsay [this message]
2007-05-11 18:27 ` Olivier Crête
2007-05-11 19:19 ` Jim Ramsay
2007-05-11 19:29 ` Olivier Crête
2007-05-11 20:03 ` Jim Ramsay
2007-05-11 19:36 ` Thomas Rösner
2007-05-11 19:52 ` Jim Ramsay
2007-05-11 20:06 ` Olivier Crête
2007-05-12 9:25 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-05-11 20:26 ` Ryan Hill
2007-05-12 0:48 ` Josh Saddler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070511121210.7a75dfa2@sed-192.sedsystems.ca \
--to=lack@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox