From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hmoqt-0004zE-78 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 12 May 2007 10:29:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4CASWdI024679; Sat, 12 May 2007 10:28:32 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4CAQmH3022467 for ; Sat, 12 May 2007 10:26:49 GMT Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1067A641B7 for ; Sat, 12 May 2007 10:26:48 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] invalid in metadata.xml Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:36:18 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200705101655.13778.bangert@gentoo.org> <46437287.4060106@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <46437287.4060106@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart26205952.2DM5axhKDN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200705111136.18887.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: b1aef575-8704-44b8-a193-35eafe9d4d92 X-Archives-Hash: 11405c8f624e610e1382375341fa8130 --nextPart26205952.2DM5axhKDN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 10 May 2007, Doug Goldstein wrote: > Thilo Bangert wrote: > > All packages with maintainer-needed will be moved to > > no-herd. > > maintainer-needed is different from no-herd. no-herd is valid when a dev > is maintaining a pkg outside of a herd. no-herd is not valid for when > the package is entirely unmaintained, maintainer-needed would be a > better tag for it. I would not make that change. i think your examples can be attained with [pseudo-xml]: no-herd maintainer-needed@gentoo.org no-herd cardoe@gentoo.org there is no ambiguity here ... -mike --nextPart26205952.2DM5axhKDN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARkSNckFjO5/oN/WBAQJTzg//UYWIZdAd/Jraw8IIAFbKQ97LoythUXJ+ kFdsTEIPyDMuFx6svzkSRNBpbyuR+K4ASMsHzRh6tg1h0xi4k122FaZnNrej9Sa+ T/Sh5olsBS7xBdIWpTtKMJmYSRpYcZuJrngP7fer/Fw6ABxzsYgPu75y3rkAhh7G G4siFrJbTT/vl6s2MTry2vggX9Ex8OibNtBP/L7sTWx7Yi9Xv/DTYScBDbn7CIp5 iTM7W7R2Qfxj12Pxxfp1RyVQ72HyPMYEA76EVC6/AUL2GfJXUjLxBAKDZ/J/tlwP 5B6LyfnMEFzgDfhlo6hfBN1nT7if3pXqciRBAb5PHX/cbB4o6WQ2cbITxTMXMSJN hW8AnT9UcvJYuA4mdMJXaezJt0l0MqWNfb/dqCBPvCNIpPgmSOJq/S3MKhn1n2iG ueCXSdazozZbtsD9cMg2oYClh2snLDHnZeUrXmK2jMJZsoTbnpxhK3ulFk3t7bIs qhBOPjwkvs6e4rTPNrsTRiy5CVHz15onLKeG65Ul2fElDz8YMZPn+gokfYZsvGhK ZUbTFU3+IIimzqS5xI1G7CpWhobTl+ZymCZWI2r6kftfmzXYjIIzGmGTcvUyar9E kxFxqgmNzYAP9q2Fxh2YHPvguD/aAgnfNKG/b7JwOX3HkoWQZVPFijApv+8x13qc 8o2d0NmGcYY= =QpUT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart26205952.2DM5axhKDN-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list