From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HmPiY-0005az-Tf for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 May 2007 07:39:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4B7cEDR022585; Fri, 11 May 2007 07:38:14 GMT Received: from canuck.infradead.org (canuck.infradead.org [209.217.80.40]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4B7aLm6020319 for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 07:36:21 GMT Received: from 213.210.179.104.adsl.nextra.cz ([213.210.179.104] helo=localhost) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HmPfm-00049L-Iq for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 May 2007 03:36:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 00:37:28 -0700 From: Greg KH To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites sys-apps/855resolution Message-ID: <20070511073728.GB1541@kroah.com> References: <9e0cf0bf0705101433o52868688qea6e8f12d31d2e72@mail.gmail.com> <1178841706.6387.0.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1178841706.6387.0.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Archives-Salt: b2fafe6e-3755-4c36-8769-7ff9448e1d39 X-Archives-Hash: bbb2e89e48c5a82ee22965607ecd9e3d On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:01:46PM -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 00:33 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > sys-apps/915resolution superseed this package and support 855 configurations. > > > > Please upgrade your configuration to sys-apps/915resolution. > > > > Comments/suggestions can be entered at bug#159586. > > > > Package will be masked at 2007-05-25, removed at 2005-06-08. > > > > Best Regards, > > Alon Bar-Lev. > > Why not just remove both when xf86-video-intel-2.* goes stable? Because it looks like the 2.x intel driver might still need this type of hack to work properly for some types of machines (my laptop being a good example of this...) thanks, greg k-h -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list