From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hlgy3-0007U8-Gx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 May 2007 07:52:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l497pFqp005344; Wed, 9 May 2007 07:51:15 GMT Received: from desiato.localdomain (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l497mR40001585 for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 07:48:28 GMT Received: from hactar.digimed.co.uk (hactar.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.2]) by desiato.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7DCB815 for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 08:48:24 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 08:48:18 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux 2.6.21 plans Message-ID: <20070509084818.7437f828@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1178667793.8555.5.camel@ashe.anyarch.net> References: <46313C29.7050501@gentoo.org> <46410388.80404@gmail.com> <4641096A.5010608@gentoo.org> <1178667793.8555.5.camel@ashe.anyarch.net> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2cvs1 (GTK+ 2.10.12; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_Lv9KfhBO=3SKKA6/gan.X=0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: d4f7ebf4-53bf-4464-b9eb-006826e8a300 X-Archives-Hash: d3aac264bde6b4829d6841e3ac03e7b3 --Sig_Lv9KfhBO=3SKKA6/gan.X=0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 08 May 2007 16:43:13 -0700, Daniel Ostrow wrote: > Mine is an x86_64 system...it also only seems to affect early adopters > of VMWare Workstation 6, which hasn't been released yet no less > considered *stable*. Once I tried WS6, the same fault showed up after going back to 5.5. However, there is a fix on the VMware forums and apparently the next WS6 RC won't have this problem. --=20 Neil Bothwick A pessimist complains about the noise when opportunity knocks. --Sig_Lv9KfhBO=3SKKA6/gan.X=0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGQXzHum4al0N1GQMRAs5HAKCq6pXgs4NCi4E+nDXE6bGMGT8ipgCgyQn2 jEUq8xmggcxE7XBPp+WtmPc= =IT5l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_Lv9KfhBO=3SKKA6/gan.X=0-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list