From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hkn6R-00085o-No for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 20:13:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l46KBAd9025812; Sun, 6 May 2007 20:11:10 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l46K7Rqp020039 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 20:07:27 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFA58D314 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 21:31:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15647-03 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 21:31:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399FE8D305 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 21:31:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 21:06:18 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade Message-ID: <20070506210618.0517c76c@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <200705061600.56357.hydrogen@notyetimplemented.com> References: <1178433936.13701.10.camel@ip6-localhost> <200705061543.45529.hydrogen@notyetimplemented.com> <20070506205347.1e4e8801@snowflake> <200705061600.56357.hydrogen@notyetimplemented.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_CgmZdr5CBr.I..YL/14T4EJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: cf1b12b6-41a0-4405-ad97-569c98f45792 X-Archives-Hash: c6badf2001890984f8312d8e503e108c --Sig_CgmZdr5CBr.I..YL/14T4EJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 6 May 2007 16:00:56 -0400 Dan Meltzer wrote: > > Er, making elog logged by default would not solve the "requires an > > explicit read" problem. Making elog require an explicit read would > > be far too annoying because most elog notices are noise. We've been > > over this already. >=20 > Not if one filters it properly. ELOG_CLASSES=3D"warn error" sounds > like a sane default to me. =20 So you want users to have to explicitly acknowledge all ewarn notices? Now *that*'s a way of making the system useless by overusing it. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_CgmZdr5CBr.I..YL/14T4EJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGPjU896zL6DUtXhERAgElAJ0dVE0wy7DYjkYBPJ6Qz1yNJMT9lwCeN5wp nMb6hUuPqXwtrIB2aF3IwQ8= =V+Io -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_CgmZdr5CBr.I..YL/14T4EJ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list