From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HklLO-00002F-Rp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 18:20:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l46IJSOZ003266; Sun, 6 May 2007 18:19:28 GMT Received: from randymail-a8.g.dreamhost.com (sd-green-bigip-202.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l46IHUfv000804 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 18:17:30 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.4] (c-75-68-33-130.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [75.68.33.130]) by randymail-a8.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CECAF5F1 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 11:17:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Meltzer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:17:29 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <1178433936.13701.10.camel@ip6-localhost> <200705061408.01878.hydrogen@notyetimplemented.com> <20070506191114.15991c45@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <20070506191114.15991c45@snowflake> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705061417.29880.hydrogen@notyetimplemented.com> X-Archives-Salt: d5897596-17f6-4080-a98a-24364fd07ba7 X-Archives-Hash: c10ba627a59e2e45b6fd95a57ec3df0e On Sunday 06 May 2007 2:11:14 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 6 May 2007 14:08:01 -0400 > > Dan Meltzer wrote: > > On Sunday 06 May 2007 1:58:57 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > On Sun, 06 May 2007 10:38:14 -0700 > > > > > > Mike Doty wrote: > > > > how is that different than using e{info,warn,error}? > > > > > > It stays visible until the user explicitly acknowledges reading it. > > > > which elog could easily be extended to do. > > But which elog does not do by default, and for good reason. and what good reason would that be? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list