From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hkica-00004C-I3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 15:26:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l46FP5CQ026624; Sun, 6 May 2007 15:25:05 GMT Received: from randymail-a7.g.dreamhost.com (sd-green-bigip-83.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.83]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l46FNJmA024398 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 15:23:19 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.4] (c-75-68-33-130.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [75.68.33.130]) by randymail-a7.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15251B72E2 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 08:23:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Meltzer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 11:23:16 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <1178433936.13701.10.camel@ip6-localhost> <463D9661.9000500@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <463D9661.9000500@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705061123.16643.hydrogen@notyetimplemented.com> X-Archives-Salt: 36cbdd4b-b3e2-4256-97b7-77a8a9c60511 X-Archives-Hash: aa0c20c5c231a56bb18242dc05e30490 On Sunday 06 May 2007 4:48:33 am Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > Hans de Graaff kirjoitti: > > What I would like to happen is that the message is added to the tree > > once, shown to users who have dev-ruby/radiant in testing immediately, > > and only shown to other users of dev-ruby/radiant when they move radiant > > to testing or radiant itself becomes stable for them. I don't see a > > mechanism to avoid this with the current GLEP, but perhaps I overlooked > > something? I guess this is what the Display-If-Upgrading-From-To: that > > Ciaran mentioned would do, but I'm wondering if GLEP 42 makes any sense > > without it. > > I guess we need a Display-If-Not-Masked: header. I'd think naming it Display-if-Visible would be a bit clearer, but the inte= nt=20 sounds right. > > Regards, > Petteri -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list