From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HkcKE-0005C6-DV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 08:42:38 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l468fhJb005502; Sun, 6 May 2007 08:41:43 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l468dJIp002166 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 08:39:20 GMT Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6AD64F74 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 08:39:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tests Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 04:39:43 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200705011508.57220.peper@gentoo.org> <200705021605.07098.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070502211248.749c6b21@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <20070502211248.749c6b21@snowflake> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart19981796.gqRMy2iU3b"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200705060439.44141.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 91408771-17b8-4d1f-895d-fcee605553f5 X-Archives-Hash: bff3e0ed1579bb3d0d1e39a1c0cdcc9f --nextPart19981796.gqRMy2iU3b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 02 May 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 01 May 2007, Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski wrote: > > > There was some discussion about forcing/not forcing tests in > > > EAPI-1, but there was clearly no compromise. > > > > the compromise was that requiring in spec is wrong ... default > > handling of tests is up to the package manager / profiles / teams > > That's a lousy solution. all ive said is that it's better than what you proposed: making src_test=20 mandatory. that is not nor ever will be a viable solution. > *Something* needs to change. There are several=20 > solutions better than the current situation; the question is whether > anyone can find one that is perfect rather than one that is merely a > lot better. the only feasible thing that should go into EAPI is to change the *default*= =20 behavior of src_test from not being run to being run ... thus all existing= =20 methods for controlling test behavior will continue to work the same =2Dmike --nextPart19981796.gqRMy2iU3b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARj2UUEFjO5/oN/WBAQKScQ/8CwKYyJgZLVDpAUxm/20LZHF585yuF0K6 sI1M3Pmy1eR1U28TreNZBasQEg9qYuFK8fEOSrfb1kcaz+m2x30cxTUfc1D2roLb jh8zA6dmpdFsrwI2TW4x1zHXERld0QunEvuOSjizshekKA8FyBylNSje/r/JTfwF AUdXMb6cimyL/oRgc2cAOzg9Slb+PmbU9wAhfSBZA9QyXerXht+Y9A9S8w+XfrYI WPAgXsrcF084FAQBYmboaFyeaANV/vMhPIvknTdje33cT9aSFISxrLE5yKPmNA4L bqJM2ituD8O1g7v3IeHE6a27jMUnb0bfIVFkGPc+hPHcMBXtQfJCd1C3C/w3O087 RkMHm5qhA4cPbZT0WHV7DsjOi35ESHgBEWsfCPoCtRfQzIGocLQ+xNwlN40xaWSG s6iT5HGSKs5veILrXbduNoUod5T/2asZNGbdte4BzsQpb+8ZitiZ7aihsFrUwvPV pYnzS9one+0jncJkJWMssZtPTXbx4Sgzn7D7dxN2X69PfCqeZERfOQAjtcOi3ljJ IiE5QIkvmTvCUotsnJ7Dg+D8LotOxaDFHDBqFzKaA4FSNYOc278kPlNkkCqrMEgX Kiw8KzYVW5oOhZUMCGp1x02toZ0tCiwAsxCUJ/QIEgdDa+2OOH733xGiRWDQTfvx 39jmYamhp4U= =G5/7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart19981796.gqRMy2iU3b-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list