From: Stephen Bennett <spb@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Should _p0 be allowed as a version suffix?
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 02:33:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070506023331.35836885@maya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <463D2926.9000307@gentoo.org>
On Sat, 05 May 2007 18:02:30 -0700
Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Should we ban the _p0 suffix from the tree
Possibly, though I don't see a real reason for it.
> or should be change the version comparison behavior so that
> implicit _p0 is less than explicit _p0?
No.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-06 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-06 1:02 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Should _p0 be allowed as a version suffix? Zac Medico
2007-05-06 1:33 ` Stephen Bennett [this message]
2007-05-06 1:40 ` Zac Medico
2007-05-06 15:10 ` Stephen Bennett
2007-05-06 15:40 ` Brian Harring
2007-05-06 8:37 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-05-06 8:59 ` Marius Mauch
2007-05-06 9:21 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-05-06 10:10 ` Piotr Jaroszyński
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070506023331.35836885@maya \
--to=spb@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox