From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HkSgX-0007wa-PF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 22:25:02 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l45MO1id000919; Sat, 5 May 2007 22:24:01 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l45MM5Jk031129 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 22:22:05 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FAF08D315 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 23:47:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28464-05 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 23:47:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036B28D305 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 23:47:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 23:21:03 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [news-item] Paludis 0.24 Message-ID: <20070505232103.596eddc1@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <463D00A1.5000103@gentoo.org> References: <200705042249.48267.peper@gentoo.org> <463CEB11.7030307@gentoo.org> <20070505214435.2358b2ed@snowflake> <200705052250.26106.expose@luftgetrock.net> <20070505222650.73f739e4@snowflake> <20070505214831.GF23900@kfk4ever.com> <20070505225652.039a83f2@snowflake> <463D00A1.5000103@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_JHbn2UkhG9S5zHdHGgs5dmw; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 695a1e1a-dec9-498b-8da8-ecbfd086f482 X-Archives-Hash: f7204b378dd5d0a3cd7ba7bf027f6aee --Sig_JHbn2UkhG9S5zHdHGgs5dmw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 06 May 2007 00:09:37 +0200 Jakub Moc wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): > > On Sat, 5 May 2007 23:48:31 +0200 > > Maurice van der Pot wrote: > >> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 10:26:50PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >>> and who knows what news item delivery looks like?=20 > >> Irrelevant, what it looks like has nothing to do with whether or > >> not it is critical. > >=20 > > No no, it matters. The degree to which an unnecessary news item > > would inconvenience the end user is relevant in making the decision. >=20 > Eh, something being inconvenient doesn't make the thing any more or > less critical, so yeah, it's entirely irrelevant. No, but it affects the impact upon user experience, which is the entire point of the process. This is, after all, about delivering what's best for affected users. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_JHbn2UkhG9S5zHdHGgs5dmw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGPQNR96zL6DUtXhERAj3aAKDTmH8Q/+9L74VlbsdIPlt227tAPACeMYEk ebT36cvhp6XBpfLVGzOPiz4= =Gbha -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_JHbn2UkhG9S5zHdHGgs5dmw-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list