From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HkSWO-0003tV-0R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 22:14:32 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l45MCweV027473; Sat, 5 May 2007 22:12:58 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l45M9u7l023361 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 22:09:57 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905FD8D315 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 23:35:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28874-02 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 23:35:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484718D305 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 23:35:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 23:08:55 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: modifications to GLEP42 Message-ID: <20070505230855.418f2380@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <200705060000.11536.expose@luftgetrock.net> References: <463CF698.6090904@gentoo.org> <20070505223429.52937697@snowflake> <200705060000.11536.expose@luftgetrock.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_VroWkTGuNoIa=yEhl/6SnTn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 5086126a-9bb6-4483-a78e-921053604d35 X-Archives-Hash: 15370dc4712d26fd124e25a47db445db --Sig_VroWkTGuNoIa=yEhl/6SnTn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 6 May 2007 00:00:11 +0200 expose@luftgetrock.net wrote: > Paludis will still work, after the upgrade, but it will produce > warnings. So there are no problems at all, it still works just fine. Paludis producing a warning (as opposed to a lower level notice -- Paludis has different levels for log notices, of which 'warning' is the highest) is something that is considered critical enough that the user should fix it before continuing. Were it not critical, a different log level would be used. This thread is not, however, about Paludis. Please keep future moaning about Paludis in the appropriate thread. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_VroWkTGuNoIa=yEhl/6SnTn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGPQB696zL6DUtXhERAvNmAJ97uT9f74Aa/IFdTPA9f8E0+sqSEwCgqyzz fO7hZxMrQU3cNJpxYVs2H7E= =wT7A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_VroWkTGuNoIa=yEhl/6SnTn-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list