From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HkRSq-0003CH-7I for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 21:06:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l45L4VUD008205; Sat, 5 May 2007 21:04:31 GMT Received: from dd14500.kasserver.com (dd14500.kasserver.com [85.13.135.241]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l45L0m3D001696 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 21:00:48 GMT Received: from hoshino (unknown [82.139.196.236]) by dd14500.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAC114324 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 23:00:48 +0200 (CEST) From: expose@luftgetrock.net To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24 Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 23:00:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200705042249.48267.peper@gentoo.org> <463CEB11.7030307@gentoo.org> <20070505214435.2358b2ed@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <20070505214435.2358b2ed@snowflake> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705052300.37693.expose@luftgetrock.net> X-Archives-Salt: 7bb0be75-a311-42c7-a69e-7063badba395 X-Archives-Hash: a341aabcc56483d0f69a9207b2110e9f Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 05 May 2007 22:37:37 +0200 > > Jakub Moc wrote: > > Erm, not really? This is about proper usage of GLEP42 stuff. > > Yes, it is about proper usage of GLEP 42. This news item is one example > of that. > > > There's nothing critical about your * stuff. > > Sure there is. If users aren't informed about the change in an > appropriate manner, the users get annoyed. > > You're trying to sabotage this based upon arguments over wording > technicalities. Where is your evidence that this is not delivering > what is best for affected users? By the way on 03.03.2007 15:14 Ciaran McCreesh also wrote: > No, it's that you're dead set on derailing it and being as unhelpful as > possible. You have absolutely nothing to contribute, as evidenced by > every previous time you've gotten involved with anything I've done, and > given how badly you tried to screw up GLEP 42 and how much of my time > you wasted doing so, I really don't want to deal with your noise ever > again. You also have a lot to gain by wrecking the process, and your > past behaviour has shown that you'll stoop to any kind of dirty > trickery and abuse of the system that you think you can get away with > rather than having a proper technical discussion. For your interest, I do not consider it as a "proper technical discussion" if someone asks for evidence without delivering it himself instead of writing one third of the discussion to > make lots of noise about it (again a quoted from Ciaran McCreesh, written by him on 11.02.2007 18:40) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list