From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-23413-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1HkRsx-0004Py-Pi
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 21:33:48 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l45LWNix012185;
	Sat, 5 May 2007 21:32:23 GMT
Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l45LRqfJ004618
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 5 May 2007 21:27:52 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9616D8D30C
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  5 May 2007 22:53:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 26840-10 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Sat, 5 May 2007 22:53:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20DA58D305
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  5 May 2007 22:53:04 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 22:26:50 +0100
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@ciaranm.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: [news-item] Paludis 0.24
Message-ID: <20070505222650.73f739e4@snowflake>
In-Reply-To: <ff8vg4-2d5.ln1@goldry.remarqs.net>
References: <200705042249.48267.peper@gentoo.org>
	<463CEB11.7030307@gentoo.org>
	<20070505214435.2358b2ed@snowflake>
	<200705052250.26106.expose@luftgetrock.net>
	<ff8vg4-2d5.ln1@goldry.remarqs.net>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_f6U=0fpCzpmxzcqo1/lwsti";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org
X-Archives-Salt: 88d47ef8-5132-45e0-8b1e-34ef443d2ea6
X-Archives-Hash: 09a8ae4fdacc8427cf42068894a23bef

--Sig_f6U=0fpCzpmxzcqo1/lwsti
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 5 May 2007 16:10:39 -0500
=C2=BBQ=C2=AB <boxcars@gmx.net> wrote:
> In <news:200705052250.26106.expose@luftgetrock.net>,
> expose@luftgetrock.net wrote:
> > I bet there are other users around, who think a config file format
> > change that doesnt break anything but produce warnings in the first
> > place is non-critical.
>=20
> I'm another one.  I guess someone needs to decide whether the
> criterion is 'critical' or 'important';  there seems to be confusion
> about the intent and wording of GLEP 42.

Are you a Paludis user who thinks that and who knows what news item
delivery looks like? If you aren't, you won't see the news item.

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh


--Sig_f6U=0fpCzpmxzcqo1/lwsti
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGPPac96zL6DUtXhERAoNvAJ9ZKZaEDixa06sx8w1SRl5upgd5/ACeLaJY
b6CLK975bhHab2egcmSlZ2o=
=2R9Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_f6U=0fpCzpmxzcqo1/lwsti--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list