From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HkRC9-0001a1-1d for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 20:49:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l45KmbUt016398; Sat, 5 May 2007 20:48:37 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l45Kjbfb012237 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 20:45:38 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E3A8D30C for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 22:10:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26839-06 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 22:10:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8F88D305 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 22:10:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 21:44:35 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24 Message-ID: <20070505214435.2358b2ed@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <463CEB11.7030307@gentoo.org> References: <200705042249.48267.peper@gentoo.org> <20070505114454.GD23900@kfk4ever.com> <20070505135020.4d129619@snowflake> <463CBA22.7070200@gentoo.org> <20070505182147.21bdd7ff@snowflake> <20070505173422.GA1263@superlupo.rechner> <20070505184647.3382e737@snowflake> <20070505191838.GB1263@superlupo.rechner> <20070505202914.3f49a88b@snowflake> <20070505200027.GC1263@superlupo.rechner> <20070505211119.372adc4d@snowflake> <463CE6CF.4070309@gentoo.org> <20070505212741.58a8506c@snowflake> <463CEB11.7030307@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_E09NFXpV8.GISa4cNMivdKS; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 8a079c12-7c6c-4a52-a54f-136bab76e1be X-Archives-Hash: abe06c295b994bae4c6f99e7fe053efc --Sig_E09NFXpV8.GISa4cNMivdKS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 05 May 2007 22:37:37 +0200 Jakub Moc wrote: > Erm, not really? This is about proper usage of GLEP42 stuff. Yes, it is about proper usage of GLEP 42. This news item is one example of that. > There's nothing critical about your * stuff. Sure there is. If users aren't informed about the change in an appropriate manner, the users get annoyed. You're trying to sabotage this based upon arguments over wording technicalities. Where is your evidence that this is not delivering what is best for affected users? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_E09NFXpV8.GISa4cNMivdKS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGPOy196zL6DUtXhERAkadAJwLCry9OU6vIk4ZRAAb9gMdOBSgVQCgvvxK aZ5wXZ3S/Pryg/hF0HjSmD8= =L11Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_E09NFXpV8.GISa4cNMivdKS-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list