From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HkPqV-0008Bt-M5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 19:23:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l45JM6MZ013909; Sat, 5 May 2007 19:22:06 GMT Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at (mailrelay.tu-graz.ac.at [129.27.2.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l45JIi3f008796 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 19:18:44 GMT Received: from superlupo.rechner (85-124-205-111.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at [85.124.205.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailrelay2.tugraz.at (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l45JIdSD002232 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 21:18:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by superlupo.rechner (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3014D57B5C; Sat, 5 May 2007 21:18:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 21:18:38 +0200 From: Wernfried Haas To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24 Message-ID: <20070505191838.GB1263@superlupo.rechner> References: <200705042249.48267.peper@gentoo.org> <20070505114454.GD23900@kfk4ever.com> <20070505135020.4d129619@snowflake> <463CBA22.7070200@gentoo.org> <20070505182147.21bdd7ff@snowflake> <20070505173422.GA1263@superlupo.rechner> <20070505184647.3382e737@snowflake> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070505184647.3382e737@snowflake> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (Linux) X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.002000 X-Spam-Score-relay: -0.4 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.62 on 129.27.10.19 X-Archives-Salt: ac4b5c12-fdfc-4843-aa57-c4115d74aea4 X-Archives-Hash: 5478bb3075381e39bc5dd9c7659a2cd8 --Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 06:46:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > It warns noisily.=20 Then it's not even close to being broken and i don't see the need for a news item. > It doesn't say how to fix it. I'm sure that can be arranged even without a news item. > > Imho the whole GLEP process is being abused to define some scenario to > > get the support for news, and then push it through for stuff way > > outside the boundaries defined in the GLEP. >=20 > Hardly... Not having the news item will cause considerable user > confusion.=20 Then you may need to rewrite the GLEP so it allows news items whenever something confuses users, not just the critical updates (e.g. incompatible mysql upgrades or the apache 2 config upgrade were used as examples) described in the GLEP. cheers, Wernfried --=20 Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org http://forums.gentoo.org || http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/proctors/ forum-mods (at) gentoo.org || proctors (at) gentoo.org #gentoo-forums || #gentoo-proctors (freenode) --Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGPNiOK/GNBBblp4ARAjDZAJ95lseY8pdmGyr3yNZhXr8bcmpR5ACfWdBU v7zu/X2ZXDSmlGRxo+GC9n0= =+y80 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list