On Sat, 05 May 2007 17:34:39 +0200
Jakub Moc <jakub@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
> > On Sat, 5 May 2007 17:12:03 +0200
> > Marius Mauch <genone@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >> a g42 news item shouldn't be issued for minor syntax
> >> changes in config files that could just as well handled completely
> >> automatically in postinst/CONFIG_PROTECT.
> > 
> > And these changes can't be handled that way, since paludis configs
> > can and do exist in home directories as well as in /etc.
> 
> Shrug; frankly just a matter of adding $HOME/.paludis/etc or whatever
> (example) to CONFIG_PROTECT... Why it couldn't be done?

Because a) the package manager touching anything in $HOME is extremely
bad form and b) configuration directories are non-enumerable.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh