* [gentoo-dev] prep* functions in ebuilds
@ 2007-05-04 16:30 Torsten Veller
2007-05-04 17:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-05-04 17:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Torsten Veller @ 2007-05-04 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
There are two bugs (140697,140699) saying that prepall and prepallman are
invoked automatically by portage.
Looking at prepall it calls:
prepallman
prepallinfo
prepallstrip
What is with prepalldocs? Is it allowed to use in ebuilds? Should it be in
pms? Or is it just missing in prepall?
Thanks.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] prep* functions in ebuilds
2007-05-04 16:30 [gentoo-dev] prep* functions in ebuilds Torsten Veller
@ 2007-05-04 17:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-05-04 17:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2007-05-04 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 288 bytes --]
On Friday 04 May 2007, Torsten Veller wrote:
> What is with prepalldocs?
some people like to install files into /usr/share/doc/$PF/ and not have it be
compressed
> Is it allowed to use in ebuilds? Should it be in pms?
yes
> Or is it just missing in prepall?
no
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] prep* functions in ebuilds
2007-05-04 16:30 [gentoo-dev] prep* functions in ebuilds Torsten Veller
2007-05-04 17:07 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2007-05-04 17:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-05-05 1:02 ` Mike Frysinger
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ciaran McCreesh @ 2007-05-04 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 330 bytes --]
On Fri, 4 May 2007 18:30:02 +0200
Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org> wrote:
> What is with prepalldocs? Is it allowed to use in ebuilds? Should it
> be in pms? Or is it just missing in prepall?
The prep* functions are Portage internals. They're not suitable for
ebuild use and shouldn't be in pms.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] prep* functions in ebuilds
2007-05-04 17:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh
@ 2007-05-05 1:02 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2007-05-05 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 377 bytes --]
On Friday 04 May 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > What is with prepalldocs? Is it allowed to use in ebuilds? Should it
> > be in pms? Or is it just missing in prepall?
>
> The prep* functions are Portage internals. They're not suitable for
> ebuild use and shouldn't be in pms.
incorrect ... prepalldocs is meant for ebuild use
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-05 1:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-04 16:30 [gentoo-dev] prep* functions in ebuilds Torsten Veller
2007-05-04 17:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-05-04 17:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-05-05 1:02 ` Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox