* [gentoo-dev] prep* functions in ebuilds @ 2007-05-04 16:30 Torsten Veller 2007-05-04 17:07 ` Mike Frysinger 2007-05-04 17:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Torsten Veller @ 2007-05-04 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev There are two bugs (140697,140699) saying that prepall and prepallman are invoked automatically by portage. Looking at prepall it calls: prepallman prepallinfo prepallstrip What is with prepalldocs? Is it allowed to use in ebuilds? Should it be in pms? Or is it just missing in prepall? Thanks. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] prep* functions in ebuilds 2007-05-04 16:30 [gentoo-dev] prep* functions in ebuilds Torsten Veller @ 2007-05-04 17:07 ` Mike Frysinger 2007-05-04 17:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Mike Frysinger @ 2007-05-04 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 288 bytes --] On Friday 04 May 2007, Torsten Veller wrote: > What is with prepalldocs? some people like to install files into /usr/share/doc/$PF/ and not have it be compressed > Is it allowed to use in ebuilds? Should it be in pms? yes > Or is it just missing in prepall? no -mike [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] prep* functions in ebuilds 2007-05-04 16:30 [gentoo-dev] prep* functions in ebuilds Torsten Veller 2007-05-04 17:07 ` Mike Frysinger @ 2007-05-04 17:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh 2007-05-05 1:02 ` Mike Frysinger 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Ciaran McCreesh @ 2007-05-04 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 330 bytes --] On Fri, 4 May 2007 18:30:02 +0200 Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org> wrote: > What is with prepalldocs? Is it allowed to use in ebuilds? Should it > be in pms? Or is it just missing in prepall? The prep* functions are Portage internals. They're not suitable for ebuild use and shouldn't be in pms. -- Ciaran McCreesh [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] prep* functions in ebuilds 2007-05-04 17:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh @ 2007-05-05 1:02 ` Mike Frysinger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Mike Frysinger @ 2007-05-05 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 377 bytes --] On Friday 04 May 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org> wrote: > > What is with prepalldocs? Is it allowed to use in ebuilds? Should it > > be in pms? Or is it just missing in prepall? > > The prep* functions are Portage internals. They're not suitable for > ebuild use and shouldn't be in pms. incorrect ... prepalldocs is meant for ebuild use -mike [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-05 1:04 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2007-05-04 16:30 [gentoo-dev] prep* functions in ebuilds Torsten Veller 2007-05-04 17:07 ` Mike Frysinger 2007-05-04 17:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh 2007-05-05 1:02 ` Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox