From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HjLz6-0002c4-7h for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 21:03:37 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l42L2dCV025027; Wed, 2 May 2007 21:02:39 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l42L0aWe022539 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 21:00:36 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077968D316 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 22:30:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30589-04 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 22:30:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D178D305 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 22:30:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 22:00:05 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for May Message-ID: <20070502220005.70f6e24a@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <200705021649.32592.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20070501093001.9C84D64F39@smtp.gentoo.org> <46370F24.8000600@gentoo.org> <200705021649.32592.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_SiaZLSWH_7oKLVUgtDRSfjI; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 51a19344-526c-432c-b0bf-8e97bd41ae7d X-Archives-Hash: 97dddb5ef03cac0d82ea724d45f0d480 --Sig_SiaZLSWH_7oKLVUgtDRSfjI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2 May 2007 16:49:32 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 01 May 2007, Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > > Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: > > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even > > > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole > > > Gentoo dev list to see. > > > > I would like the council to remind everyone that this is not > > appropriate for any team >=20 > doesnt take much to get people in a hissy over nothing What, people deliberately breaking policy that directly leads to breaking stable and not having any working ebuilds for a package in the tree, and then refusing to do anything about it is nothing? > the issue has been taken care of=20 You have a conflict of interest in this one. What do other Council members who aren't games team members think? > [to the detriment of users] How is not having broken packages committed straight to stable detrimental to users? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_SiaZLSWH_7oKLVUgtDRSfjI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGOPvX96zL6DUtXhERAuIvAJwMhQHXs5V92Er+VZ2ghWKxCmZ3gwCgiFQC mQNL5N2TC22PZU1POpWIiOE= =QNLI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_SiaZLSWH_7oKLVUgtDRSfjI-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list