From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-23281-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1HjLFG-0005JD-5c for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 20:16:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l42KF964031430; Wed, 2 May 2007 20:15:09 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l42KDKj3029141 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 2 May 2007 20:13:20 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82128D314 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 2 May 2007 21:43:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30470-04 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 2 May 2007 21:42:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E408D305 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 2 May 2007 21:42:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 21:12:48 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@ciaranm.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tests Message-ID: <20070502211248.749c6b21@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <200705021605.07098.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <200705011508.57220.peper@gentoo.org> <200705021605.07098.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_YyPGTVvKNpcdLBXukiG3KYg; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 6d61ea1c-3cc0-4da3-8d08-cb3f4d20e995 X-Archives-Hash: 2ee90a56217b301cedb275d70bf2ee19 --Sig_YyPGTVvKNpcdLBXukiG3KYg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2 May 2007 16:05:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Tuesday 01 May 2007, Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski wrote: > > There was some discussion about forcing/not forcing tests in > > EAPI-1, but there was clearly no compromise. >=20 > the compromise was that requiring in spec is wrong ... default > handling of tests is up to the package manager / profiles / teams That's a lousy solution. *Something* needs to change. There are several solutions better than the current situation; the question is whether anyone can find one that is perfect rather than one that is merely a lot better. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_YyPGTVvKNpcdLBXukiG3KYg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGOPDD96zL6DUtXhERAk51AKCbu9Ld+jKL8EEwXMiaQ4O7Zc7SdwCdHxYu uduVVMw3kU8nGE/mK8/Bjqo= =4VGa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_YyPGTVvKNpcdLBXukiG3KYg-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list