From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HjDRC-0005Qv-Rp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:56:03 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l42Bt5GY027727; Wed, 2 May 2007 11:55:05 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l42BrA55025431 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 11:53:11 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCC88D30C for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 13:23:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22841-02 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 13:23:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F73C8D305 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 13:23:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 12:52:40 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tests Message-ID: <20070502125240.3624bfaf@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <20070502003407.GC19189@seldon> References: <200705011508.57220.peper@gentoo.org> <20070502013220.7a3ae9a4@sheridan.genone.homeip.net> <1178063216.1136.6.camel@athena.fprintf.net> <20070502005505.43bb7d43@snowflake> <20070502003407.GC19189@seldon> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_wYE/wqTfxZzeAQYkbYJxNf3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 3c62b394-e549-4b92-b353-ac08c1df5a49 X-Archives-Hash: 98737e35537cfafa26ed0556e3d41d8c --Sig_wYE/wqTfxZzeAQYkbYJxNf3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 1 May 2007 17:34:07 -0700 Brian Harring wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:55:05AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > You're talking implementation details. This isn't the time for that! > > No-one has worked out what, if anything, is to be done, so you can't > > know how much work whatever it is is. > >=20 > > Having said that, there's no need to figure it out for the whole > > tree in one go if it's an EAPI change. >=20 > Please stop stating that fallacy; binding it into an EAPI version=20 > means you *have* to plan for the whole tree (meaning figure it out up=20 > front). It means figuring it out up front, but not changing the whole tree at once, which is where the problem is. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_wYE/wqTfxZzeAQYkbYJxNf3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGOHuK96zL6DUtXhERAjeFAJ42HU8ZAg0j5xMOjA68+fLtZ21ghQCgjO7Z gGm+0qLfJTERva7rPEQbRz8= =gwub -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_wYE/wqTfxZzeAQYkbYJxNf3-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list