From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hj2KO-0001BC-E4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 00:04:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4201jQf031537; Wed, 2 May 2007 00:01:45 GMT Received: from ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l41NvjDa024191 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 23:57:45 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from spb42.christs.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.233.172]:38693 helo=maya) by ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]:25) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1Hj2DD-0002g1-2B (Exim 4.63) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Wed, 02 May 2007 00:56:51 +0100 Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 01:12:03 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tests Message-ID: <20070502011203.4a6f12c8@maya> In-Reply-To: <1178063216.1136.6.camel@athena.fprintf.net> References: <200705011508.57220.peper@gentoo.org> <20070502013220.7a3ae9a4@sheridan.genone.homeip.net> <1178063216.1136.6.camel@athena.fprintf.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.7.2 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "S.P. Bennett" X-Archives-Salt: 876548af-5629-42f4-8e28-f0335a8b652a X-Archives-Hash: fa795e60c898045a51487a16e82c3345 On Tue, 01 May 2007 19:46:56 -0400 Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > There is one serious problem with this: Who's going to do the work to > figure all this out for the 11,000 odd packages in the tree? This > seems like a *huge* amount of work, work that I have no plan on doing > for the 100-odd packages I (help) maintain, let alone the 4-10 > different versions of each package. I highly doubt other maintainers > want to do this kind of work either. Last I heard the intention was to tie it to the EAPI=1 bump, so that packages can be updated one by one as they move to the newer eapi. Current (ie EAPI=0) ebuilds will continue to function as they have done. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list