From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-23265-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1Hj2TD-0001mR-5I for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 00:13:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l420CMF0010313; Wed, 2 May 2007 00:12:22 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l42099XM005544 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 2 May 2007 00:09:09 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17528D30C for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 2 May 2007 01:40:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12275-04 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 2 May 2007 01:26:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5518D305 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 2 May 2007 01:26:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 00:55:05 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@ciaranm.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tests Message-ID: <20070502005505.43bb7d43@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <1178063216.1136.6.camel@athena.fprintf.net> References: <200705011508.57220.peper@gentoo.org> <20070502013220.7a3ae9a4@sheridan.genone.homeip.net> <1178063216.1136.6.camel@athena.fprintf.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_pBRpy.jPB=/r2/ym5JUk.ki"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 6bb7f122-334d-4341-90ee-ff259b260a1b X-Archives-Hash: 5138c0a435396102acafe784b0016cb2 --Sig_pBRpy.jPB=/r2/ym5JUk.ki Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 01 May 2007 19:46:56 -0400 Daniel Gryniewicz <dang@gentoo.org> wrote: > There is one serious problem with this: Who's going to do the work to > figure all this out for the 11,000 odd packages in the tree? This > seems like a *huge* amount of work, work that I have no plan on doing > for the 100-odd packages I (help) maintain, let alone the 4-10 > different versions of each package. I highly doubt other maintainers > want to do this kind of work either. You're talking implementation details. This isn't the time for that! No-one has worked out what, if anything, is to be done, so you can't know how much work whatever it is is. Having said that, there's no need to figure it out for the whole tree in one go if it's an EAPI change. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_pBRpy.jPB=/r2/ym5JUk.ki Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGN9Nb96zL6DUtXhERAgZcAJwPuHNBJBNXRzQaaJlEIbItclkE+ACgvJIr 0v/+p0RfrcUz89OZ8xzW8A0= =HJZh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_pBRpy.jPB=/r2/ym5JUk.ki-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list